Study says marijuana no gateway drug

Marijuana is not a “gateway” drug that predicts or eventually leads to substance abuse, suggests a 12-year University of Pittsburgh study. Moreover, the study’s findings call into question the long-held belief that has shaped prevention efforts and governmental policy for six decades and caused many a parent to panic upon discovering a bag of pot in their child’s bedroom.

The Pitt researchers tracked 214 boys beginning at ages 10-12, all of whom eventually used either legal or illegal drugs. When the boys reached age 22, they were categorized into three groups: those who used only alcohol or tobacco, those who started with alcohol and tobacco and then used marijuana (gateway sequence) and those who used marijuana prior to alcohol or tobacco (reverse sequence).

Nearly a quarter of the study population who used both legal and illegal drugs at some point – 28 boys – exhibited the reverse pattern of using marijuana prior to alcohol or tobacco, and those individuals were no more likely to develop a substance use disorder than those who followed the traditional succession of alcohol and tobacco before illegal drugs, according to the study, which appears in this month’s issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry.

“The gateway progression may be the most common pattern, but it’s certainly not the only order of drug use,” said Ralph E. Tarter, Ph.D., professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy and lead author of the study. “In fact, the reverse pattern is just as accurate for predicting who might be at risk for developing a drug dependence disorder.”

In addition to determining whether the gateway hypothesis was a better predictor of substance abuse than competing theories, the investigators sought to identify characteristics that distinguished users in the gateway sequence from those who took the reverse path. Out of the 35 variables they examined, only three emerged to be differentiating factors: Reverse pattern users were more likely to have lived in poor physical neighborhood environments, had more exposure to drugs in their neighborhoods and had less parental involvement as young children. Most importantly, a general inclination for deviance from sanctioned behaviors, which can become evident early in childhood, was strongly associated with all illicit drug use, whether it came in the gateway sequence, or the reverse.

While the gateway theory posits that each type of drug is associated with certain specific risk factors that cause the use of subsequent drugs, such as cigarettes or alcohol leading to marijuana, this study’s findings indicate that environmental aspects have stronger influence on which type of substance is used. That is, if it’s easier for a teen to get his hands on marijuana than beer, then he’ll be more likely to smoke pot. This evidence supports what’s known as the common liability model, an emerging theory that states the likelihood that someone will transition to the use of illegal drugs is determined not by the preceding use of a particular drug but instead by the user’s individual tendencies and environmental circumstances.

“The emphasis on the drugs themselves, rather than other, more important factors that shape a person’s behavior, has been detrimental to drug policy and prevention programs,” Dr. Tarter said. “To become more effective in our efforts to fight drug abuse, we should devote more attention to interventions that address these issues, particularly to parenting skills that shape the child’s behavior as well as peer and neighborhood environments.”

Indeed, according to the study, interventions focusing on behavior modification may be more effective prevention tactics than current anti-drug initiatives. For example, providing guidance to parents – particularly those in high-risk neighborhoods – on how to boost their caregiving skills and foster bonding with their children, could have a measurable effect on a child’s likelihood to smoke marijuana. Also, early identification of children who exhibit antisocial tendencies could allow for interventions before drug use even begins.

Although this research has significant implications for drug abuse prevention approaches, Dr. Tarter notes that the study has some limitations. First, as only male behaviors were studied, further investigation should explore if the results apply to women as well. Also, the examination of behaviors in phases beyond alcohol and marijuana consumption in the gateway series will be necessary.

From University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Print Friendly

435 Responses to “Study says marijuana no gateway drug”

  1. Hello admin , i want how to ask question with regards to Ones content. is this okay ?(1st)Whats the meaning being that article? but i love using A New url. (2nd) are you have facebook or twitter > buyers can add Your facebook badge awfully i can like this Your New website. like this my site . Thank youbest Regards admin as to Gadgetax.com (sorry,if my english is bad. iam an italian :p)

    August 16, 2010 at 10:55 pm Reply
  2. Christina #

    It wasn’t outlawed til 1937 & is still legal on the federal level.I find it interesting that the ones in charge of outlawing it do not seem to suffer the ill effects suggested. It brings me to another theory…Aliens in the white house JK lol.

    August 14, 2010 at 3:24 am Reply
  3. maikloe #

    enough to pay for their own things, can not just eating For some of those who lose weight, losing weight means you can not eat junk food, can not eat one day casual breakfast, lunch and dinner there. This life can be a very painful thing, when you can not do what you want to do the hell kind of heart is simply a man insane. But I think we can be so distressed after, and the birth of a new weight loss drugs, and it allows us to easily lose weight without dieting, the product name is japan 2 day diet lingzhi.
    It will you lose weight quickly, friend,join us now!

    August 3, 2010 at 6:11 pm Reply
  4. Anonimo #

    I think it is amazing how false information can be so well promoted and credited, Marijuana is one of the best and safest herbs to use. It is natural, no possible overdose, has medical uses, and it has various methods of admissioin besides smoking.
    I have never heared of a long time weed smoker get cancer but I have know countless young tobacco smokers die from cancer and heart problems.
    SUPPORT CALIFORNIA PROP-19

    July 25, 2010 at 9:34 pm Reply
    • Think again Anonimo! How about Bob Marley? He sure as hell died of cancer. Marijuana smoke contains significantly more poisonous substances and 10 times as much tar (if not more). Maybe there is no proven link (yet) between weed smoking and cancer but that doesn’t mean a thing. Weed might be good fun and an ‘appropriate’ drug, but it brings serious health risks. Especially for long time users. Not to mention psychological problems too.

      July 26, 2010 at 7:47 am Reply
      • Alex #

        Wow, you really don’t know your facts. First off, yes Bob Marley did die from cancer, however, it was not from smoking weed. in 1977 he injured his foot while playing soccer with some friends. The wound seemed pretty extreme for a simple soccer injury, and when it got worse instead of healing, he decided to see a doctor. Marley was diagnosed with melanoma, and an amputation of the toe was recommended. Now you saying that weed has 10 times as much tar than tobacco is completely false. Weed does have tar in it, however there’s only 33 % of the amount of tar in tobacco. And WEED DOES NOT CAUSE CANCER!

        July 29, 2010 at 10:17 pm Reply
        • Jenn #

          The smoke from weed can cause cancer… I’m sure you wouldn’t dispute that the smoke in cigarettes that goes straight to the lungs contains carcinogens and then enters the bloodstream traveling through the body… Marijuana smoke contains 50–70 percent more carcinogenic hydrocarbons than does tobacco smoke.

          August 4, 2010 at 1:16 pm Reply
          • Anon #

            You’re disregarding the fact that cannabinoids, the active ingredients in marijuana, have anti-carcinogenic properties. Smoking marijuana delivers no net increase in cancer likelyhood to the lungs because the anti-carcinogens cancel out any carcinogens derived from the burning plant matter.

            When you eat it or vape it, the anti-cancer effects are even more profound.

            June 16, 2011 at 3:03 pm
        • Taylor Steele #

          Alex thank you for being a smart kid. lol

          November 12, 2010 at 1:29 pm Reply
      • jesse #

        if marijuana causes lung cancer or other diseases that tobacco causes why has that link not been proven? we have had alot of experience smoking tobacco and we know that it causes 438,000 deaths a year in the U.S.S. alone… we also know that 1 of 10,000 deaths per year is from coffee!!! so don’t you think that something like this would have come up from marijuana?

        August 25, 2010 at 7:35 pm Reply
        • George Chan #

          Since Marijuana is illegal, statistics can often not be correctly achieved.

          For example: a group does an anonymous survey on groups of marijuana users.

          If the government bothers, they can actually acquire a court order that forces that group to disclose the names.

          The government will then proceed to arresting and punishing those individuals under statutes.

          November 2, 2010 at 12:45 pm Reply
      • Anonymous #

        your full of shit bro weed is one of the best plants in the world has oils for cars, most carbondioxside breathing plant in the world makes so many types of clothes. and theres not one recorded death in the world of someone dying from weed. so stuff what you just said up your arse. never lone that it gets you stoned outta your head (Y)

        September 9, 2010 at 7:55 pm Reply
      • Steve L #

        If nothing else, please read the forward to the book, “marijuana is safer” which was written by former Seatle chief of police Norm Stampler. The fact is if you don’t support marijuana being legalized, you are actually contributing to allowing the current drug realities to continue. If pot was legal a substantial number of people would not drink as much alcohol which any one with half a brain knows is the far more dangerous drug. By not supporting legalization you are an accessory to the crimes that are being committed due to alcohol misuse. If pot was legal there would be fewer deaths caused to innocent americans caused by drunk drivers.

        September 13, 2010 at 10:57 am Reply
      • Devin #

        bullshit. psychological and health problems. tell that to the big whigs producing tobacco and LEGALLY putting destructive additives in them to lower their own costs, while paying off our worthless government to keep their efforts legal…spark up a joint that has zeroooo additives, and if you’re worried about 1 thing out of the 932509347509 things that apparently cause cancer, use a vaporizer. and what psychological problems do you speak of? please give one valid source that is not from some republican asshole or money-hungry group that wants to continue to keep marijuana illegal so tax payers can continue paying for those who are “not law-abiding”…who can verify that smoking marijuana causes psychological problems dipshit.

        September 16, 2010 at 2:13 pm Reply
        • George Chan #

          You smoke dried hay every day for 2 years, and I’m sure you’ll end up with some kind of a psychological problem.

          You smoke some kind of a grass full of THC every day for 2 years, you end up fubar.

          Still don’t see the relation?

          November 2, 2010 at 4:17 pm Reply
      • Hokwei #

        While it’s true Bob Marley died of cancer, he didn’t die of lung cancer, he died of skin cancer.

        November 16, 2010 at 5:14 pm Reply
    • potheed #

      As marijuana stands right now with its illegal status I must say it is a gateway drug. But if it were legalized I feel that would change. I personally don’t see marijuana as any more harmful than alcohol.

      August 3, 2010 at 5:32 am Reply
    • George Chan #

      I’m in high school.

      Kids that smoke marijuana usually don’t do very well.

      Is there a link between that and the very high THC levels in the “very-safe herb”?

      THC destroys brain cells, how is that good for you?

      November 2, 2010 at 12:42 pm Reply
      • Anon #

        THC doesn’t destroy brain cells, it activates cannabinoid receptors. Do you have a logic or philosophy class? If so, pay better attention and you’ll learn why anecdotes are a terrible thing to base an argument on.

        June 16, 2011 at 3:05 pm Reply
  5. The right person #

    You know whats funny im an underage and yet I have people run around get my cigars, K2 (basicly like weed) and you never hear a single person complaining about 18+ers buying underagers that shit.

    July 23, 2010 at 9:17 am Reply
  6. Well it can destroy lives just like any other drug.

    July 6, 2010 at 1:16 am Reply
    • Trip The Shoelace Dreamer #

      Sure can. Just like any other drug, including the ones in your bathroom and coffee maker. Your comment sounds like you’re saying “if you take a substance that alters your body or mind, you may be ruining your life.” But have you considered how many drugs you take every day? Theres a difference between Drug use and Drug abuse. Whether a drug is being used or abused is up to the user, so people ruin lives, not pot.

      July 20, 2010 at 3:48 pm Reply
      • yeyeee #

        i like this

        September 24, 2010 at 9:06 pm Reply
    • Steve L #

      If nothing else, please read the forward to the book, “marijuana is safer” which was written by former Seatle chief of police Norm Stampler. The fact is if you don’t support marijuana being legalized, you are actually contributing to allowing the current drug realities to continue. If pot was legal a substantial number of people would not drink as much alcohol which any one with half a brain knows is the far more dangerous drug. By not supporting legalization you are an accessory to the crimes that are being committed due to alcohol misuse. If pot was legal there would be fewer deaths of innocent americans caused by drunk drivers.

      September 13, 2010 at 11:06 am Reply
  7. andy #

    Ian your obviously a little retarded from all the pot you have smoked

    July 2, 2010 at 7:17 am Reply
    • Michael D #

      The kids right! There are more and more studies being done proving marijuana’s beneficial points. The main negative effects are caused by the carcinogens from the smoke, the actual active ingredients can be useful for many patients suffering from many disorders and diseases such as and not limited to: Bi-polar disorder, AIDS/HIV, Chrons disease, and glaucoma. In fact This so called “drug” has been said to help eliminate cells that turn into cancer in the lungs. THC and related “cannabinoids” appear to be “a new family of potential antitumoral agent.”

      July 11, 2010 at 7:03 pm Reply
  8. Ian #

    I think marijuana should not even be considered a drug since there are no adverse side effects. People only problem with marijuana is the sterotypical “pot smoker”. These so called “pot smokers” are portrayed as lazy, un-active, and troublesome kids. I, myself smoke marijuana; but i also maintain an A/B avereage in school. So it makes me angry when we are portrayed as bad people just because marijuana was made illegal by william hearst. He was mad that he was losing money do to increase Hemp Paper at his lumber cooperation and he helped create propaganda about how its bad, even though; scientifically proven it only has benefits. The only drug that has no adverse side effects….

    July 1, 2010 at 12:03 pm Reply
    • Ailith #

      Well said, Ian.

      July 27, 2010 at 7:49 am Reply
  9. jamie #

    i my sciance case study we are doing about the debate of cannabis being used as a medical drug i personaly agree becausei take it but also because it would save the police’s time and effort because thay wont have to raid peoples house’s but i just want to know what every one else thinks? thanx

    June 30, 2010 at 7:24 am Reply
  10. Most informative article. I hope i got more more information in this article.And this article help many people. Thanks for sharing

    June 26, 2010 at 4:01 am Reply

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. QUESTION about working out? - Begin to start your acne treatment today !!!!! - Acne Treatment Can Work !! - October 3, 2011

    [...] the first and fifth orange linkthere for more infoGot a better answer? Share it below!CaptianWhiskers protector of her Asked: QUESTION about working out?(i was wondering if my friend was…he signs connect to me i have acne on my upper back and shoulders and i have 3 stretch marks on my [...]

  2. Marijuana Myths - August 18, 2011

    [...] Marijuana Not a gateway drug – 12 year study, University of Pittsburgh [...]

  3. Benefits of Legalizing Marijuana | views from the rock - August 9, 2011

    [...] proven that marijuana does not lead to the use of other drugs any more than alcohol or tobacco. (ScienceBlog) An article that I have read stated that, “reducing marijuana use is essential to improving the [...]

  4. Marijuana Myths « Below The Lion Forums - July 17, 2011

    [...] Marijuana Not a gateway drug – 12 year study, University of Pittsburgh [...]

  5. can christians smoke weed - Page 16 - Christian Forums - July 7, 2011

    [...] drug theory is an old belief, it is like saying that "milk is a gateway for alcohol." Study says marijuana no gateway drug | Science Blog 4. Your brother is an abuser and abusers can abuse anything. You can abuse Hamburgers, that doesnt [...]

  6. Thursday Headon Radio:Last Show Of The Week! | Head On with Bob Kincaid - June 16, 2011

    [...] Study says marijuana no gateway drug [...]

  7. The Baines Report » Featured » Reducing the Deficit with Drugs - May 4, 2011

    [...] Gateway theory:  A recent 12-year study by the University of Pittsburgh finds that marijuana use does not lead to harder drugs like cocaine [...]

  8. Should Luke "Ming" Flanagan TD be arrested? - Page 15 - March 8, 2011

    [...] speak out against them and break them. I can get you reports to show it's not a gateway drug: Study says marijuana no gateway drug | Science Blog Alcohol is bad for a persons mental state…so is stress…should we make stress illegal? If I [...]

  9. How $31 of pot gave mom a 10-year-prison sentence - Page 17 - INGunOwners - February 27, 2011

    [...] Originally Posted by Osobuco Is the sentence harsh – maybe. Consider this however, say she sold to a kid and started them down the road to addiction to more serious drugs (meth, coke, etc) What is the downstream costs to taxpayers, etc due to those addictions. Now most kids who smoke weed likely do not go on to hard drugs BUT most hard drug users started out with weed. The woman is a criminal. Just like an illegal alien. She broke the law and was convicted just as she should be. Was the sentencing extreme – maybe – but if she obeyed the bloody law she wold be at home with her kids now and certainly setting a better example than raising a bunch of future dealers… Actually, most start out with cigarettes, followed by alcohol. I was surprised to look through all the objective data that points to marijuana not being a gateway drug. Here is an article about a twelve year study on the topic: Study says marijuana no gateway drug | Science Blog [...]

  10. They want to legalize it? - Page 16 - German Shepherd Dog Forums - January 31, 2011

    [...] That has been debunked as well. This is just one study I found. From the university of Pittsburgh. Study says marijuana no gateway drug | Science Blog Now for something really interesting, check out the usage comparison of not only marijuana but [...]

Leave a Reply

*