The reconciliation of Quantum Mechanics with General Relativity cannot be achieved through the Unified Filed Theory as it is currently postulated. Such a complete and verifiable theory can instead be presented by the formulation of the Quantum Singularity theory of Quantum Mechanics. Instead of strings and super strings, branes, or any other multi-dimensional postulations, the simple application of the standard four-dimensional theory of the behavior of existing large-scale singularities in the macro-universe to the micro-universe of quantum mechanics produces a reconciliation principle that follows all the existing equations, including the formation of singularities through extreme gravity and the eventual decay of them through the Hawking radiation theorem. Therefore, we no longer have to rely on the theory of multiple dimensions to account for incongruities in the currently postulated Unified Filed Theories, but instead simply realize that what may actually be appearing as oscillating strings is in fact the energy being dispersed by the Hawking radiational decay of micro-universal quantum singularities. These quantum singularities form the tapestry of the fabric of the universe, and all matter and energy spawn from them. They are born and decay under the same principles as their gigantic cousins in the macro-universe of General Relativity, and therefore they are equally as detectible. Consequently, the Quantum Singularity theory of Quantum Mechanics is the reconciliation bridge between Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity, and can so be scientifically verified by focusing testing under the same principles as those that provide such verification of the same phenomena in the macro-universe. The two theories of the universe are, therefore, simply a mirror of each other. One small, and one large, but all based on the same principles. And that is why Quantum Mechanics is not incompatible with General Relativity. They are, in reality, the same. The only difference is in how we look at them.
We are KGS Construction. We are a Northern Virginia company based out of Manassas. We provide a wide range of services including: roofing manassas, waterproofing manassas, sealant replacement, leaking roof manassas and roof repair manassas, concrete and masonry repair, and general contracting. We pride ourselves on providing superb craftsmanship and work, and because of that we are highly regarded as the preeminent commercial construction manassas company in Northern Virginia. Let us help you out with your roofing repair manassas.Check us out at http://www.kgsconstruction.com/
The Basic Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]
a recapitulation
A. Its essential statement
“Extrapolation of the expansion of the universe backwards in time to the early hot dense “Big Bang” phase, using general relativity, yields an infinite density and temperature at a finite time in the past. At age 10^-35 seconds the Universe begins with a cataclysm that generates space and time, as well as all the matter and energy the Universe will ever hold.”
E = Energy content of the universe
m = mass content of the universe
D = distance, Total = in all spatial directions, from the point of Big-Bang, of singularity’s energy-mass superposition
At D=0, E was = m and both E and m were, together, all the energy and matter the Universe will ever hold. Since the onset of the cataclysm, E remains constant and m diminishes as D increases.
The increase of D is the initial inflation, followed by the ongoing expansion, of what became the galactic clusters.
At 10^-35 seconds, D was already a fraction of a second above zero. This is when gravity starts. This is what started gravity. At this instance starts the energetic space texture, starts the straining of the space texture, and starts the space-texture-memory, gravity, that most probably will eventually overcome expansion and initiate re-impansion back to singularity.
B. Some of its further essential implications beyond Einstein-Hubble and re classical-quantum physics
And again and again : “On The Origin Of Origins”
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/160/122.page#2753
1. It promotes commonsensical scientific critical thinking beyond Einstein-Hubble.
The universe is the archetype of quantum within classical physics, which is the fractal oneness of the universe.
Astronomically there are two physics. A classical Newtonian physics behaviour of and between galactic clusters, and a quantum physics behaviour WITHIN the galactic clusters.
The onset of big-bang’s inflation, the cataclysmic resolution of the Original Superposition, started gravity, with formation – BY DISPERSION – of galactic clusters that behave as classical Newtonian bodies and continuously reconvert their original pre-inflation masses back to energy, thus fueling the galactic clusters expansion, and with endless quantum-within-classical intertwined evolutions WITHIN the clusters in attempt to delay-resist this reconversion.
2. There is no call, no need, for any dark energy. The energy of the universe is conserved. The mass of the universe is conserved in the form of energy, the energy fueling the clusters expansion. At the next universal singularity, at the next D = 0, there will again be E = m for a small fraction of a second…just wait and see…
Following Newton (1) gravity is decreased when mass is decreased and (2) acceleration of a body is given by dividing the force acting upon it by its mass. By plain common sense the combination of those two ‘laws’ may explain the accelerating cosmic expansion of galaxy clusters and the laws that drive it, based on the E/ m/ D relationship suggested above..
3. There is no call, no need, for a Higgs Particle.
The resolution of energy-mass superposition is reverted when D = 0. Shockingly sad, but must be soberingly faced rationally.
C. Its implications re the origin and nature of life beyond Darwin, re selection for survival
For Nature, Earth’s biosphere is one of the many ways of temporarily constraining an amount of energy within a galaxy within a galactic cluster, for thus avoiding, as long as possible, spending this particularly constrained amount as part of the fuel that maintains the clusters expansion.
Genes are THE Earth’s organisms and ALL other organisms are their temporary take-offs.
For Nature genes are genes are genes. None are more or less important than the others. Genes and their take-offs, all Earth organisms, are temporary energy packages and the more of them there are the more enhanced is the biosphere, Earth’s life, Earth’s temporary storage of constrained energy. This is the origin, the archetype, of selected modes of survival.
The early genes came into being by solar energy and lived a very long period solely on direct solar energy. Metabolic energy, the indirect exploitation of solar energy, evolved at a much later phase in the evolution of Earth’s biosphere.
Dov Henis
(Comments from 22nd century)
Updated Life’s Manifest May 2009
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=480&#entry412704
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/140/122.page#2321
Known electrodynamics explains exhaustingly an origin of all fields in nature and a matter. This fact does not comprise any contradictions from any points of view (see http://www.realphys.com).
However why checked up electrodynamics causes objections?
Probably it is a radical question, instead of a unified field theory.
Boris
Rethink Unified Field Theory And Evolution
Please glance at the following four brief essays and then re-read this note.
I humbly suggest that the underlying, essential thought, of these essays deserves your attention:
- Earth’s life is an up-phased matter of the inanimate matter, all matter being essentially a format of constrained energy.
- The cosmos is an evolving energy affair consisting of endless intertwined evolutions.
- Culture is a ubiquitous trait of all matter, the driver of Evolution, of all evolutions. This is an extension of Darwin’s and Broken Symmetry concepts.
- The further comprehension of Culture and Evolution is the essence of the quest for a Unified Field Theory.
Respectfully yours,
Dov Henis
(A DH Comment From The 22nd Century)
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q–?cq=1
==========================
(1) On Complexity
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/60/122.page#943
(2) “Broken Symmetry” Is Physics’ Term Of Biology’s “Evolution”
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/40/122.page#885
(3) More On Forces-Matter-Life Unified Theory
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/60/122.page#957
(4) Why ‘Life’ In Forces-Matter-Life Unified Theory
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/60/122.page#963
http://www.darkwingnightmare.com
Unification Theory
Your Subtitle text
Home Page
Link-Entity in Space!
“Dark Bang” Theory
Take a Minute
Unification Theory
The Entity
Dark Flow
Unification Theory
Unification theory attempts to reconcile the understanding of the four forces of the universe. Electromagnetic, the weak and strong nuclear forces, and gravity. The presumption is that gravity is that weakest of the four forces. Yet it can control the positions of the largest structures in the universe. How can that be?
Here is how.
The big bang theory contends that all of the materials in the universe once existed in a very small space at a singularity before the big bang occured. For all of it to have existed and be held there at once there must be a force that is greater than all of the combined forces and energy combined. What force could have done that?
Gravity did.
Did the big bang defeat that binding gravitational force? No.
The same gravitational force that maintains the control of the positions of large structures over vast distances now is the same that held them in close quarters then.
Gravitational spiral theory which is another of my own ideas like this theory is, may again return them to, and possibly beyond their original positions.
Is the position of those structures random or chaotic? No.
They are inflationary representations of their original positions before the big bang. They were systematic in relation to each other before the big bang, and are systematic now.
The measurements to prove this are already partialy seen in the behavior of elementary particles and will be proven for light, strings, extra dimensions, waves, and all else. The gravitational forces do not become weaker for smaller or lighter waves and particles, it becomes stronger. How else could they be contained and held at the singularity when it should be that their properties would make them more difficult to contain?
Gravity becomes stronger at smaller distances and with lighter subjects which relegate the other three forces to sub-forces of gravity, and is supported by observing their behavior.
The real question is this:
What force defeated gravity and triggered the big bang?
It actually was not defeated, but forced into its flux control of inflation at the points we prove through physics.
And the force that ignighted the big bang and began inflation was?
Stay tuned for the answer.
Copyright 2008 2008. russell maggio. All rights reserved.
Posted by darkwingnightmare at 10/10/2008 1:54 AM | Add Comment
Dov Henis
“On incompatibility of general relativity and quantum mechanics”
Dec 30, 2005
DH, in biologicalEvolution forum.
Occasionaly I come across a statement similar to the following one in Scientific American, December 2005, Black Holes, p.49, T A Jacobson, R Parentani:
“As currently understood general relativity and quantum mechanics are incompatible. Gravity, which general relativity attributes to the curvature of the spacetime continuum, stubbornly resists being incorporated into a quantum framework”.
I know very little about physics in general and next to nothing about general relativity and quantum mechanics and nil about the curvature of spacetime continuum. But plain common sense tells me that the subject incompatibility problem may be a matter of concept and of terminology.
Re concepts, the universe is not only a spacetime continuum but also a spacedistance (from big-bang point) continuum and a spaceevolution (since singularity) continuum. Along the since-big-bang distance-time axes the universe has been undergoing, since the big bang, material-energy evolutions and natural-laws evolutions. In an analogy between life’s evolution on the tiny dust particle planet Earth ( orbiting around one of the hundreds of billions of suns in the milky-way galaxy, which is one of the billions of galaxies in the universe ) and the evolution of the cosmos:
If the Earth’s 4.6 billion years are compressed into a single year the Precambrian Era, during which first life forms evolved, would last from January 1 to mid-November, and our time, the Quaternary era, would occupy only the last four hours on New Year’s Eve. Yet the present stock of Earth life comprises modifications of both the single-cell first life forms and of the most complex recent poly-cell organisms and of a wide range of their in-betweens.
Likewise in the 14 billion years old Cosmos the present stock of material-energy forms and of their behaviour-laws comprises modifications of both its early quantum mechanics forms-rules and of their most recent evolved versions of general relativity and of a wide range of their in-betweens.
And re the terminology, I suggest that the term “theory” with connotations of “laws of nature” is not always appropriate-applicable at all stretches along a very long axis of evolution of the cosmos. On Earth, along the route, the continuum, between the early single-cells and the human primate evolved not only the life forms but also their behaviour laws. Likewise in the Cosmos along the routes, the continuums, between the early material forms and their present states, evolved not only material forms but also their behaviour laws, and these might have evolved in several isolated “space enclosures” in different routes.
Thus characterizing a continuum involves not only theories applicable-proven along some of its distinct stretches of evolution; it involves also discernment and comprehension of the evolving phases of its evolution and of their integration.
And in the case of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, maybe they need to be related to each other not via a Final Theory but via Comprehension of Cosmic Evolution.
DH
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q–?cq=1&p=189