<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data sorting world record: 1 terabyte, 1 minute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/</link>
	<description>Science news straight from the source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lu</title>
		<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-14004</link>
		<dc:creator>Lu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-14004</guid>
		<description>Não entendi nada, como foi esta operaração 1tb em 60&#039;, como aconteceu?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Não entendi nada, como foi esta operaração 1tb em 60&#8242;, como aconteceu?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emile</title>
		<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-14003</link>
		<dc:creator>Emile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-14003</guid>
		<description>good question. 1 Big fat record :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good question. 1 Big fat record <img src='http://scienceblog.scienceblogcom.netdna-cdn.com.scienceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LVS</title>
		<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-14002</link>
		<dc:creator>LVS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-14002</guid>
		<description>WTF? SI units is not used in CS. But the question remains - did the author mean 1000 GB or 1024 GB?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF? SI units is not used in CS. But the question remains &#8211; did the author mean 1000 GB or 1024 GB?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charly</title>
		<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-14001</link>
		<dc:creator>charly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-14001</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should read up on SI prefixes. 1 terabyte is 1000 gigabytes, not 1024.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should read up on SI prefixes. 1 terabyte is 1000 gigabytes, not 1024.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Cooper</title>
		<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-14000</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-14000</guid>
		<description>Any benchmark using real time is meaningless for evaluating the efficiency of any computing algorithm, as the result is also dependent on the performance of the hardware.

Give me big O notation or give me nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any benchmark using real time is meaningless for evaluating the efficiency of any computing algorithm, as the result is also dependent on the performance of the hardware.</p>
<p>Give me big O notation or give me nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blh</title>
		<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13999</link>
		<dc:creator>blh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13999</guid>
		<description>Yes.  It is picky.  Saying that 1000 is of essentially the same magnitude as 2^10 is a very common, hand-wavy way to relate the two amounts - in both computer science and industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  It is picky.  Saying that 1000 is of essentially the same magnitude as 2^10 is a very common, hand-wavy way to relate the two amounts &#8211; in both computer science and industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reply to Firescreamer</title>
		<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13998</link>
		<dc:creator>Reply to Firescreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13998</guid>
		<description>Dear Firescreamer,actually 1TB is 10^12 bytes in SI units. 1TiB (powers of 2) is 2^40 bytes or 1024^4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TerabyteThe Author is actually correct, it is just you that is wrong...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Firescreamer,actually 1TB is 10^12 bytes in SI units. 1TiB (powers of 2) is 2^40 bytes or 1024^4. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TerabyteThe" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TerabyteThe</a> Author is actually correct, it is just you that is wrong&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-Man</title>
		<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13997</link>
		<dc:creator>E-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13997</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested to know what language was used to write the sort algorithm? Was it something custom or something standard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to know what language was used to write the sort algorithm? Was it something custom or something standard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rgh</title>
		<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13996</link>
		<dc:creator>rgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13996</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not picky. It shows that the author has a fundamental lack of understanding of the subject matter.  The total lack of useful content in this article also show this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not picky. It shows that the author has a fundamental lack of understanding of the subject matter.  The total lack of useful content in this article also show this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slh</title>
		<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13995</link>
		<dc:creator>slh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13995</guid>
		<description>How many records were in the 1 TB that was sorted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many records were in the 1 TB that was sorted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13994</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13994</guid>
		<description>Thanks man for this is information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks man for this is information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gordiannii</title>
		<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13993</link>
		<dc:creator>gordiannii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13993</guid>
		<description>wining about an error 2.3438% amounts to &quot;being picky&quot; :) the message is clear...1000 or 1024 GB is a lot of data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wining about an error 2.3438% amounts to &#8220;being picky&#8221; <img src='http://scienceblog.scienceblogcom.netdna-cdn.com.scienceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  the message is clear&#8230;1000 or 1024 GB is a lot of data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firescreamer</title>
		<link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13992</link>
		<dc:creator>Firescreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13992</guid>
		<description>I hate this kind of errors:
&quot;sorted more than one terabyte of data (1,000 gigabytes or 1 million megabytes)&quot;

it should be:
&quot;sorted more than one terabyte of data (1,024 gigabytes or 1 048 576 megabytes)&quot;

It makes difference, it&#039;s error of nearly 48  gigabytes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate this kind of errors:<br />
&#8220;sorted more than one terabyte of data (1,000 gigabytes or 1 million megabytes)&#8221;</p>
<p>it should be:<br />
&#8220;sorted more than one terabyte of data (1,024 gigabytes or 1 048 576 megabytes)&#8221;</p>
<p>It makes difference, it&#8217;s error of nearly 48  gigabytes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 8/23 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 550/564 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via scienceblog.scienceblogcom.netdna-cdn.com.scienceblog.com

Served from: scienceblog.com @ 2012-02-13 12:21:52 -->
