<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Data sorting world record: 1 terabyte, 1 minute</title> <atom:link href="http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/</link> <description>Science news straight from the source</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Lu</title><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-14004</link> <dc:creator>Lu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:59:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-14004</guid> <description>Não entendi nada, como foi esta operaração 1tb em 60&#039;, como aconteceu?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Não entendi nada, como foi esta operaração 1tb em 60&#8242;, como aconteceu?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Emile</title><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-14003</link> <dc:creator>Emile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:12:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-14003</guid> <description>good question. 1 Big fat record :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good question. 1 Big fat record <img
src='http://scienceblog.scienceblogcom.netdna-cdn.com.scienceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LVS</title><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-14002</link> <dc:creator>LVS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:32:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-14002</guid> <description>WTF? SI units is not used in CS. But the question remains - did the author mean 1000 GB or 1024 GB?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF? SI units is not used in CS. But the question remains &#8211; did the author mean 1000 GB or 1024 GB?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: charly</title><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-14001</link> <dc:creator>charly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:39:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-14001</guid> <description>Maybe you should read up on SI prefixes. 1 terabyte is 1000 gigabytes, not 1024.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should read up on SI prefixes. 1 terabyte is 1000 gigabytes, not 1024.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neil Cooper</title><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-14000</link> <dc:creator>Neil Cooper</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:07:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-14000</guid> <description>Any benchmark using real time is meaningless for evaluating the efficiency of any computing algorithm, as the result is also dependent on the performance of the hardware.Give me big O notation or give me nothing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any benchmark using real time is meaningless for evaluating the efficiency of any computing algorithm, as the result is also dependent on the performance of the hardware.</p><p>Give me big O notation or give me nothing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: blh</title><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13999</link> <dc:creator>blh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:10:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13999</guid> <description>Yes.  It is picky.  Saying that 1000 is of essentially the same magnitude as 2^10 is a very common, hand-wavy way to relate the two amounts - in both computer science and industry.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  It is picky.  Saying that 1000 is of essentially the same magnitude as 2^10 is a very common, hand-wavy way to relate the two amounts &#8211; in both computer science and industry.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Reply to Firescreamer</title><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13998</link> <dc:creator>Reply to Firescreamer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:42:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13998</guid> <description>Dear Firescreamer,actually 1TB is 10^12 bytes in SI units. 1TiB (powers of 2) is 2^40 bytes or 1024^4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TerabyteThe Author is actually correct, it is just you that is wrong...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Firescreamer,actually 1TB is 10^12 bytes in SI units. 1TiB (powers of 2) is 2^40 bytes or 1024^4. <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TerabyteThe" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TerabyteThe</a> Author is actually correct, it is just you that is wrong&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: E-Man</title><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13997</link> <dc:creator>E-Man</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:41:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13997</guid> <description>I&#039;d be interested to know what language was used to write the sort algorithm? Was it something custom or something standard?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to know what language was used to write the sort algorithm? Was it something custom or something standard?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rgh</title><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13996</link> <dc:creator>rgh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:53:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13996</guid> <description>It&#039;s not picky. It shows that the author has a fundamental lack of understanding of the subject matter.  The total lack of useful content in this article also show this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not picky. It shows that the author has a fundamental lack of understanding of the subject matter.  The total lack of useful content in this article also show this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: slh</title><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13995</link> <dc:creator>slh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:28:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13995</guid> <description>How many records were in the 1 TB that was sorted?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many records were in the 1 TB that was sorted?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amanda</title><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13994</link> <dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:24:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13994</guid> <description>Thanks man for this is information.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks man for this is information.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gordiannii</title><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13993</link> <dc:creator>gordiannii</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:16:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13993</guid> <description>wining about an error 2.3438% amounts to &quot;being picky&quot; :) the message is clear...1000 or 1024 GB is a lot of data.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wining about an error 2.3438% amounts to &#8220;being picky&#8221; <img
src='http://scienceblog.scienceblogcom.netdna-cdn.com.scienceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> the message is clear&#8230;1000 or 1024 GB is a lot of data.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Firescreamer</title><link>http://scienceblog.com/36957/data-sorting-world-record-falls-computer-scientists-break-terabyte-sort-barrier-in-60-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-13992</link> <dc:creator>Firescreamer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:54:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/uoc--dsw072710.php#comment-13992</guid> <description>I hate this kind of errors:
&quot;sorted more than one terabyte of data (1,000 gigabytes or 1 million megabytes)&quot;it should be:
&quot;sorted more than one terabyte of data (1,024 gigabytes or 1 048 576 megabytes)&quot;It makes difference, it&#039;s error of nearly 48  gigabytes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate this kind of errors:<br
/> &#8220;sorted more than one terabyte of data (1,000 gigabytes or 1 million megabytes)&#8221;</p><p>it should be:<br
/> &#8220;sorted more than one terabyte of data (1,024 gigabytes or 1 048 576 megabytes)&#8221;</p><p>It makes difference, it&#8217;s error of nearly 48  gigabytes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 12/25 queries in 0.028 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 544/556 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via scienceblog.scienceblogcom.netdna-cdn.com.scienceblog.com

Served from: scienceblog.com @ 2012-05-16 14:12:02 -->
