Skip to main content

Smoothing out fluctuations in wind power with "wind"

April 18, 2009 by Fred Bortz

Fred Bortz's picture

In reading the current issue of New Scientist, I found a pointer to a blog entry called "Bug eats electricity, farts biogas."

Needless to say, I had to learn more.

So I clicked through to read about some research being done 100 miles from my home as the crow flies, except the crow would run into the Allegheny Mountains on the way.

One of the problems with wind power is that it is not always available when needed. When the wind blows strongly, it produces more power than can be used immediately, but when the weather is calm, supplemental power will be required. The article describes a process for chemical storage of electrical energy produced by wind and other inherently variable sources, primarily solar.

To quote the article: "The new method relies on a microorganism studied by Bruce Logan's team at Pennsylvania State University in University Park. When living on the cathode of an electrolytic cell, the organism can take in electrons and use their energy to convert carbon dioxide into methane." The methane can then be burned to produce electricity, the same way as natural gas can be used but with a significant advantage. Instead of burning a fossil fuel, the process recycles atmospheric CO2, or even better, the CO2 from flues of conventional power plants. It's carbon neutral.

It gives a whole new meaning to the euphemism "passing wind."

Fred Bortz
Science Books for Young Readers
and
Science Book Reviews

Comments

Max and the Methane Bug

April 19, 2009 by Fred Bortz, 31 weeks 4 days ago
Comment: 36261

My on-line friend Ron Wade and his libertarian alter ego Max Gross have an amusing tete-a-tete about this discovery.

Click and enjoy! (If you are reading this after April 19, 2009, you may have to scrool down or search the blog.)

Fred Bortz
Science Books for Young Readers
and
Science Book Reviews

Why not just use capacitors?

April 19, 2009 by levbor, 31 weeks 4 days ago
Comment: 36260

Why not just use capacitors?

Re: Capacitors

April 19, 2009 by Fred Bortz, 31 weeks 4 days ago
Comment: 36262

I doubt capacitors are cost-effective (or even feasible) at the energy-storage scale involved here, since I have not seen any serious proposals for using them. There are all kinds of alternatives that have been proposed, such as batteries and pumped water, but cost and engineering are issues that have to be considered.

A bug that farts methane may be more cost-effective. Despite the humor, that may turn out to be a useful technology.

Fred Bortz
Science Books for Young Readers
and
Science Book Reviews



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.


Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes