Skip to main content

No Data, No Results, No Problem, No Bel!

October 9, 2009 by Renaisauce

Renaisauce's picture

As a fan of professional science, I was thrilled to hear that the Nobel Peace Prize was offered to President Obama, and not just because I want to hear someone yell "you lie!" during his speech in Oslo before getting tazed by agents of the King. My hope is that the bold initiative taken by the Peace Prize committee will finally extend to all the other Nobel categories.

In this future, this could be a tremendous boost to young scientists with big ideas. For example, take the guys who, several years back, undertook a gene therapy trial in an attempt to cure hemophilia. Such pioneering thinking and guts clearly deserved a Nobel, right? A medal would have come in pretty handy when the first person died. "Hey, I want to say this procedure doesn't work, but what am I gonna do? They're Laureates!"

If the President can get a Nobel for encouraging hand-shaking and making people cry with hope during his eight months in office, surely we can encourage our most promising scientists by handing out the hardware early. Watson and Crick may have found out the structure of DNA after getting it wrong the first time without help from the Swedes, but they would have looked much younger at their awards ceremony (not to mention that Rosalind Franklin would have had one!)

Think how good a Nobel for a promising theory would look on an NSF grant application. "I submit this request for funds. I am aware that I haven't published any results thus far, but I remind the review board that my press release in the university newsletter was Nobel-worthy." Tough to argue, and tough to withhold the tax-payer dollars to the guy inventing the definitive cure for cancer (hey, it worked in rats!)

While I understand that the approach to the Peace Prize is different than prizes awarded for science, there's no reason for the principle to not be carried over. After all, there is nothing wrong with dialogue, and the audacity of hope deserves audacious recognition. Really, it's about time to make this practice the centerpiece of our recognition system. Haven't we always told our children that it was the "thought that counts"? It's time we, as adults, lived to that same high standard (or at least have that intention.)

In fact, I look forward to the Peace Prize approach being applied to the entire award industry. I look forward to Michael Bay's Oscar win for the solid movie he might one day make, and to LA Clippers rookie Blake Griffen being given his 2012 Finals MVP trophy as soon as possible. And I'm not just saying that to up the chances of my ingenious novel idea winning the Pulitzer before sending it on to potential editors. Did somebody say "bidding war"?

Comments

Mindless drivel

October 10, 2009 by Anonymous, 6 weeks 5 days ago
Comment: 45370

You know, it's really sad to see this kind of crap on a site that I have looked to for years as a source of honest advances in science. What does this commentary offer other than a mindless political rant? Is the author part of the Nobel committee? Are they a member of congress? Are they at the very least someone who is capable of looking at Obama as though he existed beyond his eight months in presidential office? No, no, and no.

If all you want to do is throw an obviously biased viewpoint at us, god knows there are plenty of other forums for that.

In Response to the Critique

October 26, 2009 by Renaisauce, 4 weeks 3 days ago
Comment: 45797

I wish I'd checked back in this earlier, it would have made my day on an earlier day.

I take offense only at the following lines of the anonymous critique:

First, that the anonymous reader assumes that I am neither on the Nobel committee or a member of congress. How does anonymous know? Of course I'm not, but I refuse to have my potential limited in any way, even by anonymous people.

Second, the article was not mindless. I never write anything mindless. Witless, yes. Ungrammatical, yes. Mindless, no.

Third, it was not drivel. I know, because no one uses the word "drivel" anymore.

Fourth, my entry was not a critique of Obama (mostly), it was a critique of the Nobel Peace Prize committee, which has always seemed a little iffy to me. You rarely look at a Science Blog-relevant prize and think, "I don't know if he/she earned it". But that does seem to happen with the Peace prize every couple of years. It's a weird double-standard.

You know what it's like? It's like bad NBA draft picks. Take the case of Rafael Araujo, center out of BYU, 2004. He had a stellar year in the Mountain West and had some toughness. However, he was 25 and, to quote Bill Simmons, "ran like a duck". Rob Babcock, GM of the Toronto Raptors, drafted him 8th overall. Way too high. For the rest of his very short NBA career, Araujo fought to live up to the high draft pick and was constantly criticized. The standards weren't his fault, they were Babcock's (who was fired shortly thereafter). I'm just saying that the Peace Prize committee sometimes pulls a Babcock and gets trigger-happy on potential. Darko Milicic and Greg Oden are other good examples.

And that's why I'm a scientist instead of a politician or an NBA GM. (Although, if the NBA were looking...)

Eat your heart out, Peter Higgs

October 9, 2009 by Fred Bortz, 6 weeks 6 days ago
Comment: 45353

On the light side: I noted in one of my own blog entries that Peter Higgs might deserve the Nobel Prize even if the results of the LHC experiments show that his theorized particle does not exist. He's not getting any younger, you know! (The prize is award to living people only.)

On the serious side: Even though I am a great admirer of our president and worked hard for his election, my reaction was that this is premature. If Obama's approach bears fruit and the international climate is better for his presidency, which I hope will be the case, then he will have earned the prize that he was awarded today.

Fred Bortz
Science Books for Young Readers
and
Science Book Reviews



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.


Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes