UFO- The Future Challenge

Aerospace

Welcome ,here i will give you the reasons why i have chosen this topic to discuss with you.To put it the first place,i still didn't understand the perfect reason why it is called a "unidentified" flying object as there were/are plenty of cases registered about witnessing this so called Alien space craft.As told in a book named "The Secrets of the Saucers",by Mr.Orfeo Angelussi,who witnessed the spacecraft(May 23 1952) and was told by the aliens(yes,he had a direct conversation with the aliens which he mentioned in the same book) that the design was so genuine which needs high degree of precision and control over the stability is highly difficult for the earthlings.So designing such a perfect spacecraft will definitely be a challenge.And who knows this genuine structure might become a means of transport to travel large distances and even helps to meet our relatives living in other planet in the coming centuries.wouldn't u agree with me?

How does it look like----------------------

As stated by those who had close encounter with these unique structures,these take the shape of an ellipsoid(remember the blockbuster "Independence day")spheroid,boomerang,triangle.These travel at a speed of light[1] which is quite contrast to that stated as an impossible factor by Sir. Albert Einstein,in his theory of relativity,who can be regarded as a synonym to genius.They can explode and implode at any time and changes apparently colors at any instant.

How will it work------------------------

To put this in a nut shell ,i will help you understand in a much better way. First of all how does an aircraft fly?When air is allowed to flow over the aerodynamically designed aircraft,unsymmetrical pressure distribution over the upper and lower surfaces of the aircraft(wing) produce a aerodynamic force and generate motion. In the case of a space ship,cosmic rays plays a vital role in generating the motion.It plays the role of "air" as in the case of aircraft lift.You may put me a question that after all cosmic rays does not comes under a fluid category. Of course but still these rays are a combination of high energy particles and interact strongly in electro magnetic field to generate motion

Space ships are made of highly attenuated(weaker) densities and the cosmic rays must be deviated from its core structure to sustain motion.For this they are not made of too much lead which helps cosmic rays to easily penetrate into the ship.Space ship hulls are not much more than many layers of skins made of plastic crystal substance.Some layers are positively ionized and some negative.These are insulated from each other with neutral layers between them.The approaching cosmic rays are rendered unstable by the surrounding magnetic field about the ship.upon reaching the hull they are completely shattered.This might be one of the reason behind its motion.Similar to those observed as wingtip vortices and wakes,cosmic rays produce their own magnetic wakes and vortices around the ship,which proves my comparison is to be right.

What is a mother ship----------------------

Recalling the climax of the independence day,where we see our heroes fighting with the mother ship,is the one which controls these smaller ships.The master beam from the mother ship,which can be sort out by these space ships,also helps to maintain the motion and veer in right angle turns without effecting the disk.

What is our next step towards it------------

I am not discussing this topic to make you believe the existence of the aliens or the mother ship,because i have had never witnessed them even in my dream,but definitely the design might persist.So engraving the complicated tasks in the history through our names would be a matter of our life and for that I am ready to dedicate my life.. i feel that the design yet didn't reach a nominal progress.And remember that these objects and their physical concepts defy our popular laws of physics such as Law of conservation of momentum,Newton's gravity and as mentioned before the Theory of Relativity.Though there are many organizations which focus their mirrors and reflectors to gaze at the ever expanding universe to catch the glimpse of this design,yet they couldn't find a extensive report on its existence,because of its puzzling orientation.

ready for a challenge.

REFERENCE:
THE SECRETS OF THE SAUCERS:ORFEO.M.ANGELUSSI(::FORGOTTEN BOOKS.COM)

You can start your research and develop interest by surfing through the following
LINKS:
http://www.hyper.net/ufo/overview.html
http://www.hyper.net/ufo/physics.html

http://aerospacepage.blogspot.com/2008/07/ufo-future-challenge.html#link...

for more and more interesting topics visit www.aerospacepage.blogspot.com

Submitted by bhanukishan on Wed, 2008-08-06 19:42.

The one true statement about UFOs

Submitted by MarshallBarnes on Tue, 2008-09-02 17:40.

Careful...We learned how to swat flies over here http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/caltech-scientists-discover-why-flies-are... .

Civil discourse

Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 2008-08-07 17:54.

A few skeptics really base their understanding in completely reasonable arguments, and after all, they are free to set whatever standards they wish for what is admissible as good evidence.

But more often than not, the skeptic that raises their voice is no better than the wishful UFO believer, both reaching their conclusion without considering the evidence.

Here is something for readers to ponder. There are several dozens of witnesses of the Roswell incident without opportunity to confabulate that maintain a story consistent with the view that an alien craft crashed. Meanwhile, the only supporting evidence of Project Mogul is the fact that a real project mogul existed and that the air force claims that this is what really crashed in Roswell NM.

Not one witness of the crash validates this claim.

If this crash was not an alien craft, what would it take for this many witnesses to maintain this position for this many years? what would it take for any "true witnesses" or participants of Project Mogul to keep quiet?

Unless it is all true.

please...

Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 2008-08-07 10:37.

Ahhh, the ignorant speak as well as pass judgment. I bet you voted for Bush.

about evidence & disclosure

Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 2008-08-07 10:34.

Scientific Method
Scientific method refers to the body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. It is based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning. A scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses. (note observation is evidence & part of the scientific process)

US CODE: Title 18,3502. Admissibility in evidence of eye witness
The testimony of a witness that he saw shall be admissible in evidence in a prosecution in any trial court ordained and established under article III of the Constitution of the United States. (note that a good quality witness is evidence)

One of the most frequently raised objections to the presence of actual alien vehicles and their occupants here on Earth - or anywhere else for that matter - is the assumed absence of scientific proof. First of all, it needs to be stressed that scientific evidence, per se, is in abundance: it exists in photos and films, radar records, electrical interference (some times on a wide scale), unexplained background radiation and/or chemical changes at landing sites, tens of thousands of military and intelligence reports, and testimony from thousands of unimpeachable sources such as pilots, astronauts, naval officers, and so on, as we have seen. However, it is true that proof remains elusive - at least, for the great mass of humanity. And that is no accident. The truth is there, but it is being denied to the general public, as well as to an overwhelming majority of scientists.

In conclusion, whatever threat is posed by certain alien species (if any), we have more to fear from our own kind, and official disclosure might be just the sort of shock we need (as Reagan said several times, including to the UN). But based on the evidence I'm aware of, I believe a full revelation would be destabilizing. Disclosing prematurely the facts about such a situation would run the risk of social upheaval on an unprecedented scale. So in this case, I believe a gradual disclosure, the planned agenda, is by far the wisest course.