About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Weed has NEVER NEVER, NEVER been HARDLY even studied until recently. YOUR INHALING SMOKE, but weed is worse. YES WORSE THEN CIGS. Why does everybody or, at least a lot, say "ooo its not harmful, its good for you, its not a drug its a herbbb." ITS BC THATS ALL THEY KNOW. just because it feels good and makes so called "better", doesn't been its actually GOOD AND HEALTHY.
Take for example RX drugs. Yea they are good for you and to help you, BUT HOW LONG DO MOST OF THEM STAY ON THE MARKET BECAUSE THEY CAUSE DEALTH OR COMPLICATIONS???
because they've never been fully studied and not always actually "good for you"