Reply to comment
seriously my ass
October 20, 2009
by Anonymous,
5 weeks 2 days ago
Comment: 45628
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
what does that have to do with weed? That is what everyone says on that side of the argument - you say we don't know anything but then you have nothing to back it up. Marijuana has been something that people have studied for a long time because they like it. it didnt just start getting studied. People have been learning about weed for years because they enjoy smoking it and want to learn more about it. Weed is in no way worse than cigarrettes. Everyone that i know that smokes cigs coughs up black stuff and is miserable whenever they exercise. i smoke weed everyday and i have no problem exercising. So dont give me that crap. Weed is not good for you, but anything that makes you feel good is probably not good for you (except for one thing but i think we can all figure out what it is).
I have no problem accepting that weed is a bad thing if there is legitimate info to back it up.