Reply to comment
That headline disrespects scientists
January 12, 2008
by Fred Bortz,
1 year 45 weeks ago
Comment: 26921
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Creationists may cite this commentary on Fisher's theory, but then they always abuse the uncertainty inherent in science and the way theories develop through challenges and resulting modifications.
Any theory that remains completely intact after 78 years is truly remarkable. But any theory that has served as a strong link in the chain of developing ideas is worthy of respect despite its flaws.
Don't you think you are doing a disservice to scientists by implying that they accept exiting theories uncritically? That basically accepts the creationists' mischaracterization of science and scientists.
Fred Bortz -- Science and technology books for young readers (www.fredbortz.com) and Science book reviews (www.scienceshelf.com)