About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
“You have more confidence in creationists than I do!†You may be right, because I grew up in a vicarage on the Swedish country side. And I am still allowed to sing in a church choir (they lack tenors), even though I believe in evolution and like Spinoza think that god and universe are the same. I sometimes think that “the allmighty laws of nature†created evolution as a very creative and efficient tool for the creation, letting the process climb a phenotypic landscape assuming that the structure of the landscape completely determines the possible shape of organisms. Besides, I have’nt seen any proof that electro-magnetism is a product of some random process. But, of cource, this is by no means obvious.
For sake of balance, I have also criticized creationists on different forums. For instance, take a look at wikipedia below and replace “salesman†by “creationistâ€, and you will see what I mean.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travelling_salesman_problem#Example_letting...
Gkm