Reply to comment
well..
January 14, 2008
by Benedikt Terhechte (not verified),
1 year 45 weeks ago
Comment: 26964
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
This is an interesting comment, for I did not (in any way) claim my disbelief in god; I just tried to explain the basic reasons which could have led to the creationism/science debate. Most scientist (and even the catholic church themselves) will gladly explain that the accepting of evolution doesn't necessarily void god; Coming once again to the problem: The lack of understanding of eveolution (due to the being not accessable from the traditional system) leads to this whole confusing debate.