Reply to comment
3rd possibility
January 14, 2008
by Friend (not verified),
1 year 45 weeks ago
Comment: 26969
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Hello,
thank you for your interesting comments.
Please let me introduce the third possibility:
non-theistic intelligent design.
For further information, please see www.rael.org and download the free e-book. I reccommend not relying on second hand opinions about this movement, nor on any pre-judjments you might be tempted to have... ;) It just completes the array of existing possible explanations with this science-based option. This one can even be proven, as we as a humanity are building life in the laboratory already! Macro-evolution on the other hand cannot be proven because of the time-spans involved.
Love
Friend