Reply to comment
3d possibility
January 16, 2008
by Friend (not verified),
1 year 45 weeks ago
Comment: 26995
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Thank you for your comment. Please allow me to make a precision: the 3rd possibility that I mentioned has aboslutely NOTHING to do with "supernatural" things or creators. Therefore it is NOT a supernatural theory. That's exactly why I recommended to read the book for yourself, so you can make up your own mind and not rely on 2nd hand opinions or pre-judgements. I'm sure, you will get the picture then. The 3rd possibility introduced by the Raelian Movement is a 100% materialistic, non-theistic ID theory. No obscurantism, no esotersim or similar involved at all!
The "religion" of the Raelian Movement is science! :)
Love
Friend