Reply to comment
macro evolution and problem solving algorihtms
January 19, 2008
by Friend (not verified),
1 year 44 weeks ago
Comment: 27055
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Hello Gkm,
the power of the supposed mechanism of macro-evolution should be very big, of course. I don't think I underestimate it, because I grew up with evolution as "religion". I really know a lot about it and fully understand the principles. This is just to say that I am not a person who just believes in something different without knowing the science behind the established theories. I exactly understand the Raelian Vision BECAUSE I know the darwinian story...
Regarding your comment: "But the simulation still shows the power of the principle of evolution"
Yes, it shows exactly that: the power of an intelligently designed mathematical evolution and NOTHING MORE. In my view, because of the profound differences between the two "settings" the results can in no way be seen as supporting evolution OF LIFE ON EARTH, which is a totally different matter: no designer, no algorithm, no direction, no calculating machine, no problem to solve, etc.
Still, I am pretty sure that our designers used some pretty good "evolutionary algorithms" to design lifeforms... ;) And we will do the same VERY soon!!! :)
I still invite you to go read this new theory for yourself. What do you think? Is this theory worth reading a book of about 100 pages containing the message of our designers? What if you find that it's true? You have nothing to loose, and it's totally free (as e-book)!
Love
Friend