Science Blog

Science news straight from the source

Navigation

  • Topics
    • Aerospace
    • Animals
    • Anthro and Archaeology
    • Bio and Medicine
    • Brain and Behavior
    • Business and Economy
    • Computers and Electronics
    • Education and Outreach
    • Energy and Environment
    • Geoscience
    • Internet and Communication
    • Media and Entertainment
    • Nanotech, Chem and Materials
    • Physics and Numbers
    • Security and Defense
    • Software
    • Space
    • Transportation
  • Reader Blogs
  • Commerce
  • Register/Login
  • RSS
Home Why is losing $10 worse than winning $10 is good?
  • Contact
  • Home
Google

Recent Comments

  • Josh -- once is enough
  • A few books for Josh Greenberger
  • Seriously
  • Oh for goodness sake
  • The Onion?
more

Reader Blogs

  • Spine-Relaxing Chairs Invented
  • City Council To Recognize Physics Students For Solving Stephen Hawking Mistake
  • Cystic Fibrosis – Axentis Pharma Initiates Clinical Trial for Lung Infections
  • Mysterious Disc Found
more

not average but single event

Submitted by Anonymous on Sun, 2008-05-18 18:34.

The trouble with all these "both ways are equal on average" scenarios is that when presented to people they are given (or often assume they are given) ONE chance at a loss or gain.

Yes, if they were deciding for a community (many people playing) or if they knew they had 1000 chances, then they may act "rational".

But most people are assuming one toss, one pick, one iteration. And so they are choosing rationally given that assumption (i.e. take the sure thing).

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Copyright, Science Blog.
Think. It's not illegal yet. Read our Privacy Policy.
RoopleTheme