- Topics
- Aerospace
- Animals
- Anthro and Archaeology
- Bio and Medicine
- Brain and Behavior
- Business and Economy
- Computers and Electronics
- Education and Outreach
- Energy and Environment
- Geoscience
- Internet and Communication
- Media and Entertainment
- Nanotech, Chem and Materials
- Physics and Numbers
- Security and Defense
- Software
- Space
- Transportation
- Reader Blogs
- Commerce
- Register/Login
What makes that more rational?
Submitted by coglanglab on Mon, 2008-05-19 12:34.
I'm not sure why you think it is rational to take the "sure bet" if you only get one chance, but leaving that aside, there is a much, much bigger problem:
When the gamble is posed as a gain (lives saved), people take the safe option. When it is posed as a loss (people dying). But it is still the same problem. That is the behavior we are trying to understand.
There are a lot of good suggestions out there, some in the comments to this blog, but I don't think the fact that people are treating it as a single occurrence is going to be sufficient by itself.
Please try my web-based experiments
