About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here?
Let's talk.
The other half of the equation is
blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science,
please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our
Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.
Fred:
Of course they also state:
Thus what they are "really" saying is that once again we have a "tacit" assumption that should, and can, be made subject to experimental verification or falsification!
This is also to say nothing of there being at least some evidence that the Universe is not accelerating, and, hence, there need be no "dark energy".
David
P.S. You used the term "dark matter" in the body of your post where you should have used "dark energy". I trust this was simply a tiny lapse. :-)
P.P.S What?!? Now Blockquotes do nothing?!?