- Topics
- Aerospace
- Animals
- Anthro and Archaeology
- Bio and Medicine
- Brain and Behavior
- Business and Economy
- Computers and Electronics
- Education and Outreach
- Energy and Environment
- Geoscience
- Internet and Communication
- Media and Entertainment
- Nanotech, Chem and Materials
- Physics and Numbers
- Security and Defense
- Software
- Space
- Transportation
- Reader Blogs
- Commerce
- Register/Login
- RSS
RE3: Since you claim my book is old stuff...
Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 2008-05-21 15:40.
Fred - My evidence is the same as yours - The redshift indicates that the galaxies are moving away from each other. Until recently the scientists all thought the galaxies were moving away from each other as the expansion (big bang) of the universe ran its course and would be slowing down and would eventually fall back only to repeat this action again - but they found out they were wrong in 1998. They realized the galaxies were actually accelerating outward - so their theory fell apart. They had to do some major rethinking to repair their theory so they invented dark energy and resurrected Einstein's cosmological constant.
I had already surmised that the galaxies where accelerating (falling) when I published my book two years before in 1996. To me it looked like the galaxies are simply falling toward an unseen attractive force.
My "Finite Universe Theory" with the galaxies falling (accelerating) toward its boundary makes more sense then the "patched up" big bang theory with its exploding singularity, rapidly expanding space and the eventual entropy as the galaxies fly off into the unknown and the universe freezes over.
Come on now Fred - does this really make sense to you? If you buy that - I've got a nice bridge in Brooklyn I'll sell to you cheap.
Best regards - Don Hamilton

