Skip to content

Reply to comment

Civil discourse

August 7, 2008 by Anonymous, 1 year 15 weeks ago
Comment id: 31429

A few skeptics really base their understanding in completely reasonable arguments, and after all, they are free to set whatever standards they wish for what is admissible as good evidence.

But more often than not, the skeptic that raises their voice is no better than the wishful UFO believer, both reaching their conclusion without considering the evidence.

Here is something for readers to ponder. There are several dozens of witnesses of the Roswell incident without opportunity to confabulate that maintain a story consistent with the view that an alien craft crashed. Meanwhile, the only supporting evidence of Project Mogul is the fact that a real project mogul existed and that the air force claims that this is what really crashed in Roswell NM.

Not one witness of the crash validates this claim.

If this crash was not an alien craft, what would it take for this many witnesses to maintain this position for this many years? what would it take for any "true witnesses" or participants of Project Mogul to keep quiet?

Unless it is all true.

Reply



About us

Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.