Reply to comment
Response
November 17, 2008 by Anonymous, 50 weeks 4 days ago
Comment id: 32902
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
"you can't tell me that animal planet, the discovery channel, and the history channel is full of lies. Give me a break!"
Where is this claim supported in the article? The article makes no claim about the quality of television content. Nor does the article claim that "everything you watch is junk." Rather it says that people surveyed described TV as junk (except for their favorite shows). It takes further argument to move from that to the claim that "TV is junk", and the author of this study has NOT made that claim.