About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here?
Let's talk.
The other half of the equation is
blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science,
please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our
Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.
Without reading the book, Anonymous asks
and then states
The theme of the book is the answer to the first question, and I hope my review conveys author Richard Wrangham's point clearly.
We are not talking about "every living creature," but rather one particular early hominid or pre-hominid species that developed cooking. The advantages of cooked food for extracting nutrition enabled that creature to evolve a larger brain. By the time that creature had evolved into genus Homo, cooking was part of its cultural environment. As in any case of evolution, what begins as a beneficial circumstance in that creature's environment can become a necessity. Wrangham argues that human survival as a species now requires cooking.
As for the second point, Wrangham does not say that it is impossible for an individual to live on a raw food diet. In fact, today's agricultural and food preparation technology makes it even more likely that a person can find the nutrition needed.
But for the species overall, and for many individuals, becoming "raw foodists" does not appear to be a successful strategy. In my review, I discuss this point as presented by Wrangham:
So the anonymous commenter may be surviving or even thriving on a raw food diet, but according to this book, s/he is an exception, and has apparently become a zealot for the cause.
I am always wary of zealots, and this is certainly no exception.
Fred Bortz
Science books for young readers
and
Science book reviews