Reply to comment
Scientism is very limited!
June 7, 2009
by Anonymous,
24 weeks 3 days ago
Comment: 37102
Reply
About us
Science Blog was started in August 2002. It lives, breathes and eats press releases from research organizations around the globe. Most of what you read here are press releases from the outfits named in the stories themselves. Got a news story you think belongs here? Let's talk. The other half of the equation is blog posts from readers like you. So if you have an interest in science, please register and join others like you in an ongoing, vibrant dialog about what makes the world tick. Meantime, please take a minute to read our Privacy Policy and Site Disclaimer.Recommended
Andrew Sullivan Dan Sullivan Doug Arellanes Emmanuelle Richard Faith Sullivan Fred Bortz Heather Havrilesky Henry Copeland Kate Sullivan Ken Layne lagreenbean.com LAist.com Maggie Sullivan Matt Welch NewYorkology Opinion L.A. Ron Kaye Slashdot Steve Elzer & Family TheNewsroom.org Thor Garcia Tony Pierce Wonkette OlderThanks CNET for naming Science Blog one of your Blog 100!
Fred c'mon man there are no scientifically established cures. Medical doctors and scientists only know how to suppress symptoms. There is no motivation for them to cure anything because there is just too much money to be made on the sickness of the humans on this planet. There is only one disease. If you want to get healthy you have to remove the obstructions to the flow of energy, and you can never do that by applying pharmaceutical isolates, which coincidentally come from raw plants. Why not eat the whole plant and keep the body chemistry balanced. Also when a woman becomes truly healthy there will only be a small amount of mucus along with the unused egg. Why would nature get rid of the most precious fluid in the body every month? You may have read a lot of books but it does not sound like you have much experience. You can read every book ever written about cats, but you still wouldn't know what it is like to BE a cat.
P.S. You are doing great work!