Female orgasm ability related to walking style

In response to the morons who cite "hyperbolic" femininism that supposedly claimed that women cannot have vaginal orgasms, I suggest you get your facts right. I am a graduate instructor of women's sexuality.

Freud's frigidigy has long been used to constrain female sexuality and this article is but a recent recurrence in a long line of attempts to tell women that there is a right and wrong way to acheive an orgasm. We should not have to fit our anatomies into an A OR B box. Vaginal orgasms please most men more because they derive their pleasure from vaginal penetration but 50-75 percent of women cannot acheive orgasm from vaginal penetration alone.

Feminists have NOT taught that NO women can acheive vaginal orgasm, but we have illuminated the fact NOT all women can and there is nothing wrong with clitorial orgasms, vaginal orgasms, or what most women actually prefer, the combination orgasm.

And for you women who using your personal experience of a vaginal orgasm to deny the history of women who anatomically cannot acheive a vaginal orgasm being marginalized and oppressed, you seriously need to rethink your stance. We did infibulations in this country until the 70's to "cure" frigidity but no one wants to talk about or hear about that.

And as for the article above, it simply reeks of sexual repression. It is not women's anatomies that are at fault. There is nothing psychosexually wrong with sexual variation in the way women's bodies are formed sexually. Men need to adapt their sexual styles to adapt to a variety of of anatomical differences in women. Not all women get off in the same way. We never have.

You tell them, girl!

You're not. Most women( if not all) don't have vaginal orgasms. They all lie, and they will do this forever. Most women(if not all) can have clitoral orgasms. That is easy, and done best by the woman herself. Men just can't handle these facts, and will never be able to.

Good luck.

Note that the participants were asked *first* to fill in a survey on their orgasmic history, following which they were asked to exhibit their walk for the researchers. It can't be ruled out that the survey boosted the confidence of women who had experienced vaginal orgasm, making them feel more 'authentically feminine', and in turn giving their walk a bit of a feminine strut.
Hence, in any decent study, half the participants would have completed the procedure in reverse order.

Anyone who genuinely believes that there is anything remotely "scientific" about this study, or that it has any place in the realms of science clearly has no idea about the basics of empirical scientific research. I suggest that those of you who believe that this "study" is valid consider going back to GCSE science, because this "research" fails at the most basic of levels.

Yes, hello--
I am a highly regarded scientist from East Angola. My all-women group of scientific cohorts is currently performing a similar experiment. We are videotaping university men, chosen on the basis of broadness in chest, musculature in arms, and high ratings in the attractivity scale of hirsuit growth patterns (for these three traits correspond strongly with testosterone levels). We record these subjects acting in various authoritative roles in public spaces, with according uniforms/resources given them for the purpose of the study.

We are trying to determine if there is, indeed, a correlation between authoritative self-esteem and complete loss of perception as to the scope of reality/ their own fallibility/totally ridiculous and self-serving ideas masked as scientific pusuits. In other words, is it an anomoly or actually quite often that a white lab coat equals "watching girls go walking by", as Mick Jagger sings, turning into mind-boggingly ridiculous "scientific" discoveries?

If you would like to help fund this venture, please go to www.completelyassanine.com
or
http://www.thefword.org.uk/features/2009/04/for_the_good_of

And thank you in advance for your wish to increase woman kind's knowledge of these important matters!

Please, shut up. Your stupid spouting contradicts years and years of scientific study.

Errr... you guys don't seriously believe this do you? I assure you: there is no such thing as a vaginal orgasm. There is however such a thing as the clitoral tissue deeper inside (call it the g-spot if you like) being stimulated enough to climax. There is in fact also such a thing as feeling an orgasm both around the g-spot as clitoris when both areas are stimulated - combined orgasm. But at the end of the day, no matter where you feel it, it's all the same thing. In essense clitoral, so to speak. I can't believe people are still so ignorant. By the way, purely "clitoral" orgasms are more intense, most women will agree on that one.

So we can see the "orgasmic gait"?

I've also noticed that frigid women are that way for a reason. They don't have vaginal orgasms and they probably don't have clitoral ones as well.

Does any one know of a cheap device that can show "orgasmic brainwaves". I'm learning to give women orgasms by hypnosis and what to prove that I'm actually giving them orgasms.

Harry Mete

Vaginal orgasm is very real. spare me the feminist hyperbole.

It is not a scientific study, by opportunist sexologists! Vaginal orgasm and G-spot don’t exist: Sexologists should spread certainties for all women not hypotheses without scientific bases and it is possible stimulate the clitoris during the vaginal intercourse with fingers always (also during first time). See video in it.youtube.com/ newsexology

The obsevation that there is a relationship between a womans vaginal orgasmic ability and her walk is not too surprising.

The importance of pelvic muscle development and female orgasmic ability has been demonstrated numerous times ever since Dr. Kegel first recognized it.

Pelvic muscle strength and training has a direct effect on a woman's posture and back health. Good pelvic muscle strength would naturally effect how a woman carries herself as she walks.

A chiropracter friend of mine routinely prescribes pelvic muscle strengthening for his female patients to address their chronic back pain. He tells me for those women who follow his recommendations not only improve their back posture and eliminate back pain, they also report improved sexual enjoyment. Not a surprize.

One woman openly shared how she went from barely tolerating sex for the sake of her marriage to developing the ability to spontaneously vaginally orgasm at will through the development of her pelvic muscles and changes in her diet. She then enjoyed sex so much her husband had to ask her for breaks as the daily sex and her desire for mutliple orgasms was too much for him keep up with.

David Christian Solomon
www.EasyOrgasmDiet.com

As a woman who can orgasm regularly and easily, I have to say that orgasming makes all the muscles in the pelvis loosen, and you certainly feel much more confident and sexy having regular orgasm, so a more confident and 'sexual' stride makes some sense. However, I find it hard to believe that this is measurable, not to mention the fact that a 'sexy' walk can easily be adopted, without the orgasm.

That is the current number of reads for this article. The previous and next article have 957 and 361 respectively.

It's just interesting to know that, even in geek circles, sex sells.

Now, excuse me while I study how to figure out a womans sexual experience by watching her walk. :)

Actually, the article says orgasmic history, not ability to have vaginal orgasms.
This implies they can determine if the woman have actually had vaginal orgasms by watching them walk.
Does this mean that the first vaginal orgasm permanetly changes a woman walk?

of course the scotts and belgiums are doing this study...
http://www.vaonlineservices.com l>