Duke University and University of North Carolina (UNC) researchers report in the November issue of Arthritis Care & Research that narcotics and diagnostic testing are overused in treating chronic neck pain. Their findings indicate clinicians may overlook more effective treatments for neck pain, such as therapeutic exercise. According to reviews cited in the study, evidence to support the effectiveness of therapeutic exercise in treating chronic neck pain is good, yet only 53% of subjects were prescribed such exercise. This information was based upon reported data from a representative sample of North Carolina residents.
Prior studies point out that neck pain affects 30%-50% of adults in the general population in any given year, and roughly 50%-85% of those patients do not find their symptoms completely resolve, with some experiencing chronic, impairing pain. Chronic neck pain, like lower back pain, often does not respond to the treatment provided and can have similar economic impact in terms of lost work time and higher healthcare costs.
For the current study, Adam Goode, PT, DPT, and colleagues from the UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research used data from a 2006 telephone survey of 5,357 North Carolina households. The researchers analyzed responses from 135 non-institutionalized adults over 21 years of age who had chronic neck pain, which was defined as pain and activity limitations nearly every day for the prior three months, or greater than 24 episodes of pain the previous year that limited activity for one or more days. More than half the participants were women (56%) and most were non-Hispanic white (81%).
Results indicate that the prevalence of chronic, impairing neck pain weighted to the North Carolina population was 2.2%. The researchers reported the average duration of chronic pain was 6.9 years, with subjects seeing roughly five different types of healthcare providers and 21 ambulatory care visits.
The study reported that participants received 1.6 diagnostic tests such as spinal radiographs (45%), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-30%), and computed tomography (CT-24%) scans. In the prior year, subjects who received X-rays of the spine had an average of two different sets taken which the authors noted to be inconsistent with clinical decision-making guidelines for diagnostic imaging. “For patients with such a long disease duration, the likelihood that imaging techniques would offer clinically important inferences may decrease,” explained Dr. Goode.
More than 56% of subjects in the study used over-the-counter medications (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), 29% reported taking strong narcotics (MS contin, oxycodone), and 23% used weak narcotics (codeine, propoxyphene) for their chronic neck pain. The authors reported that medical evidence on the effectiveness of medications in the treatment of chronic neck pain is quite limited, based on systematic reviews published in The Cochrane Library and The Bone and Joint Decade (BJD) 2000 — 2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders: Noninvasive Interventions for Neck Pain.
“Rehabilitation conditioning and acupuncture studies have shown to be effective treatments that were less frequently used by patients with chronic neck pain,” Dr. Goode said.
The most commonly used treatments by study participants were superficial heat (57%), prescribed exercise (53%), cold (47%), spinal manipulation (36%), and therapeutic massage (28%). “Our sample population had a high degree of disability, despite using a number of diagnostics and treatments. Based on current evidence, several treatments were over-used, and some effective treatments were under-used,” concluded Dr. Goode.
This study is published in the November issue of the Arthritis Care & Research. Media wishing to receive a PDF of this article may contact [email protected].
Full citation: “Prevalence, Practice Patterns, and Evidence for Chronic Neck Pain.” Adam P. Goode, Janet Freburger, and Timothy Carey. Arthritis Care and Research; Published Online: August 4, 2010 (DOI: 10.1002/acr.20270); Print Issue Date: November 2010. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.20270/abstract
About the Journal
Arthritis Care & Research is an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (ARHP), a division of the College. Arthritis Care & Research is a peer-reviewed research publication that publishes both original research and review articles that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with arthritis and related disorders, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, health care economics, health care policy, educational, social, and public health issues, and future trends in rheumatology practice. For details, please visit Arthritis Care & Research.
Wiley-Blackwell is the international scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly publishing business of John Wiley & Sons, with strengths in every major academic and professional field and partnerships with many of the world’s leading societies. Wiley-Blackwell publishes nearly 1,500 peer-reviewed journals and 1,500+ new books annually in print and online, as well as databases, major reference works and laboratory protocols. For more information, please visit www.wileyblackwell.com or our new online platform, Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), one of the world’s most extensive multidisciplinary collections of online resources, covering life, health, social and physical sciences, and humanities.
ACR Annual Meeting Press Registration Now Open
Press registration is now open to journalists planning to attend the 2010 ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meeting in Atlanta. Held November 6-11 at the Georgia World Congress Center, the ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meeting is the premier meeting in rheumatology.
For more information, including to view the press conference schedule, visit www.rheumatology.org/education. Follow the meeting on twitter by using the official hashtag: #ACR2010.