A closer look at what caused the Flint water crisis

Flint, Michigan, continues to grapple with the public health crisis that unfolded as lead levels in its tap water spiked to alarming levels. Now the scientists who helped uncover the crisis have tested galvanized iron pipes extracted from the “ground zero” house. They confirm in the ACS journal Environmental Science & Technology that the lead that had accumulated on the interior surface of the pipes was the most likely source of the lead contamination.

Flint’s tap water became contaminated with high lead levels after the city turned to the Flint River to supply its water in April 2014. When they switched, officials didn’t use a corrosion-control treatment to maintain the stability of rust layers (containing lead) inside service lines. Within a month of the switch, residents started to report smell and color changes to their water. After her family started getting sick, Flint resident LeeAnne Walters contacted Virginia Tech engineer Marc Edwards and asked him to test her water. All 32 samples from the Walters’ home contained lead concentrations above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency action level of 15 micrograms per liter. Four samples were above 5,000 micrograms per liter, the threshold for hazardous waste. And one sample contained 13,200 micrograms per liter.

Kelsey Pieper and other colleagues on Edwards’ Flint water study team have now analyzed the galvanized iron pipes that originally ran from the lead service lines to the Walters’ ground zero house in which the first child with elevated blood lead levels from water was identified. In the tap water, the high lead concentrations strongly correlated with the levels of cadmium, zinc and tin, which were also components of the pipe’s original internal coating. According to the researchers, these results suggest that, without corrosion inhibitors, the Flint River water caused the rust layers (with attached lead) to release from the interior of the iron pipe. The combination of lead pipe followed by galvanized iron pipe, is likely to be a health concern in other cities where this configuration is found. They explain that replacing lead service lines is a good step, but the accumulation of lead on old galvanized iron pipes, is also a potential long and short-term problem.

Substack subscription form sign up
The material in this press release comes from the originating research organization. Content may be edited for style and length. Want more? Sign up for our daily email.

3 thoughts on “A closer look at what caused the Flint water crisis”

  1. Surface water sources may require additional chlorine due to State and EPA regulators.
    The formulation for the chlorine can be based on the number of connections at maximum flow.
    The highly chlorinated water sat in the pipes due to low demand and even more corrosion occurred, consuming chlorine, which required the addition of more chlorine to maintain the minimum ordered residual throughout the system.
    Our state ignored our complaints of extreme increases, disdain and damages only until they learned the septic systems were failing. They soon informed the states operators that Clorox had increased the strength of their solution. Was this also a factor in Flint?
    Not enough emphasis has been placed on the chlorine and the EPA certainly doesn’t want people to know. EPA changed their website and eliminated some already well hidden information about chlorine after a hard question shortly after the Flint situation became well known last year.

  2. I’ve been doing plumbing for a long time and I have never seen nor heard of a lead pressure pipe. There used to be some tail pieces that connected basement wash tubs up to drain lines but never on the supply side. It is just too soft.

Comments are closed.