Multiple sclerosis is not a disease of the immune system?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) not an immune disease, claims researcherAn article to be published Friday (Dec. 23) in the December 2011 issue of The Quarterly Review of Biology argues that multiple sclerosis, long viewed as primarily an autoimmune disease, is not actually a disease of the immune system. Dr. Angelique Corthals, a forensic anthropologist and professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, suggests instead that MS is caused by faulty lipid metabolism, in many ways more similar to coronary atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries) than to other autoimmune diseases.

Framing MS as a metabolic disorder helps to explain many puzzling aspects of the disease, particularly why it strikes women more than men and why cases are on the rise worldwide, Corthals says. She believes this new framework could help guide researchers toward new treatments and ultimately a cure for the disease.

Multiple sclerosis affects at least 1.3 million people worldwide. Its main characteristic is inflammation followed by scarring of tissue called myelin, which insulates nerve tissue in the brain and spinal cord. Over time, this scarring can lead to profound neurological damage. Medical researchers have theorized that a runaway immune system is at fault, but no one has been able to fully explain what triggers the onset of the disease. Genes, diet, pathogens, and vitamin D deficiency have all been linked to MS, but evidence for these risk factors is inconsistent and even contradictory, frustrating researchers in their search for effective treatment.

“Each time a genetic risk factor has shown a significant increase in MS risk in one population, it has been found to be unimportant in another,” Corthals said. “Pathogens like Epstein-Barr virus have been implicated, but there’s no explanation for why genetically similar populations with similar pathogen loads have drastically different rates of disease. The search for MS triggers in the context of autoimmunity simply hasn’t led to any unifying conclusions about the etiology of the disease.”

However, understanding MS as metabolic rather than an autoimmune begins to bring the disease and its causes into focus.

The Multiple Sclerosis Lipid Hypothesis

Corthals believes that the primary cause of MS can be traced to transcription factors in cell nuclei that control the uptake, breakdown, and release of lipids (fats and similar compounds) throughout the body. Disruption of these proteins, known as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), causes a toxic byproduct of “bad” cholesterol called oxidized LDL to form plaques on the affected tissue. The accumulation of plaque in turn triggers an immune response, which ultimately leads to scarring. This is essentially the same mechanism involved in atherosclerosis, in which PPAR failure causes plaque accumulation, immune response, and scarring in coronary arteries.

“When lipid metabolism fails in the arteries, you get atherosclerosis,” Corthals explains. “When it happens in the central nervous system, you get MS. But the underlying etiology is the same.”

A major risk factor for disruption of lipid homeostasis is having high LDL cholesterol. So if PPARs are at the root of MS, it would explain why cases of the disease have been on the rise in recent decades. “In general people around the world are increasing their intake of sugars and animal fats, which often leads to high LDL cholesterol,” Corthals said. “So we would expect to see higher rates of disease related to lipid metabolism—like heart disease and, in this case, MS.” This also explains why statin drugs, which are used to treat high cholesterol, have shown promise as a multiple sclerosis treatment.

The lipid hypothesis also sheds light on the link between MS and vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D helps to lower LDL cholesterol, so it makes sense that a lack of vitamin D increases the likelihood of the disease—especially in the context of a diet high in fats and carbohydrates.

Explains why multiple sclerosis more common in women

Corthals’s framework also explains why MS is more prevalent in women.

“Men and women metabolize fats differently,” Corthals said. “In men, PPAR problems are more likely to occur in vascular tissue, which is why atherosclerosis is more prevalent in men. But women metabolize fat differently in relation to their reproductive role. Disruption of lipid metabolism in women is more likely to affect the production of myelin and the central nervous system. In this way, MS is to women what atherosclerosis is to men, while excluding neither sex from developing the other disease.”

In addition to high cholesterol, there are several other risk factors for reduced PPAR function, including pathogens like Epstein-Barr virus, trauma that requires massive cell repair, and certain genetic profiles. In many cases, Corthals says, having just one of these risk factors isn’t enough to trigger a collapse of lipid metabolism. But more than one risk factor could cause problems. For example, a genetically weakened PPAR system on its own might not cause disease, but combining that with a pathogen or with a poor diet can cause disease. This helps to explain why different MS triggers seem to be important for some people and populations but not others.

“In the context of autoimmunity, the various risk factors for MS are frustratingly incoherent,” Corthals said. “But in the context of lipid metabolism, they make perfect sense.”

Much more research is necessary to fully understand the role of PPARs in MS, but Corthals hopes that this new understanding of the disease could eventually lead to new treatments and prevention measures.

“This new framework makes a cure for MS closer than ever,” Corthals said.

Substack subscription form sign up
The material in this press release comes from the originating research organization. Content may be edited for style and length. Want more? Sign up for our daily email.

4 thoughts on “Multiple sclerosis is not a disease of the immune system?”

  1. The NMSS literature, and all published MDs I’ve read say “MS is thought to be” an autoimmune disease. And there are plenty of published papers out there saying the immune system causes the scarring found in MS, but wondering about what causes the inflammation that activates the immune system in the first place.

    Dr. Corthals’ theory seems to clearly explain what causes the inflammation–faulty lipid metabolism, which causes plaques to form in the central nervous system. It also explains my experience over the last nearly 16 years that a strict low-fat diet filled with unprocessed fruits, vegetables and whole grains keeps MS symptoms at bay. And upping fat intake causes symptoms to flare.

    I don’t care who figures out the mystery of MS. As long as the right answer is found, I’ll be glad to thank the day worker from the local jail, if that’s who gets “the researchers and MDs” on the right track!

    Research is being done right now at Oregon Health Sciences University to study and prove the impact of a low-fat, vegan diet on MS. If MSers have a metabolic disorder, a cure will be hard to come by. But wouldn’t it be wonderful if all the “experts” could come to agreement and support a low-fat diet as a treatment, as they support a low-sugar diet to treat diabetes? Folks with diabetes live challenging lives too, but it must be easier having all the “experts” on the same page, and knowing for sure how to best treat the disease yourself.

    I am grateful to Dr. Corthals for taking the time to publish this paper! Theories need to be published so people (experts and non-experts alike) can discuss them and do the research necessary to find the right treatment for MS, which currently remains too much a mystery disease.

  2. Agreed RonK… Scientific papers and research need to be provided to prove the hypothesis brought forth by Dr. Corthals anthropologist. It is highly irresponsible and only offers false hope.
    I only say this because I myself have had MS for 13yrs, and of course I would like a” miracle cure”, however the information and subjective opinion you blogged about offers nothing of the sort.
    Thank you.

  3. As interesting as it is, this hypothesis fails miserably to explain how the current treatments for MS which *have* been shown to work, could possibly do so.

    Not labeling this post as being a kind of “what if” scientific paper, rather than, a “we show” scientific paper, is rather irresponsible.

  4. Could you please provide specific links of research supporting your hypothesis. As I read your blog, it is painfully evident that this is your opinion vs fact and research which is valid.

    Also, pls clarify are you an MD? From what I read your anthropologist, which would make you a PH.D vs a Medical Doctor, correct?

    Do you have MS? As interestingg as your blog came across I strongly disagree with your hypothesis. MS may not be solely an AI disease, however, it is highly plausable being an AI is the primary or foundation of the disease.

    Thank you

Comments are closed.