Giving some homeless mothers with young children a place to live may do little to help them if it is not combined with support services, a first-of-its-kind study showed.
Researchers found that young moms with a substance use disorder showed less improvement if they were given only housing when compared with similar moms who were given housing and supportive services, or even mothers who were only given a list of community services available to them.
That’s an important finding for organizations and policymakers who have advocated a “housing first” policy that aims to get the homeless into permanent housing as quickly as possible, said .
Families with children are one of the fastest growing segments of the homeless population, now accounting for nearly one-third of those experiencing homelessness.
The study is the first in this area to use what is considered the “gold standard” in research: a randomized controlled trial.
Young homeless moms (age 18-24) with one or more children under the age of 6 who had a substance use disorder were randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments: the usual support services given in the community, housing only, or housing with support services.
The researchers recruited 240 women in Columbus from shelters, a drop-in center and other agencies serving homeless youth.
The one-third of participants who received housing and supportive services were given a voucher for independent housing and six months of supportive services, including strengths-based outreach and advocacy, HIV prevention, and substance use and mental health counseling.
Another third were only provided housing, while the remaining third were given “services as usual” – they received a referral sheet of all services available to them in the community, but where not offered housing or support services through the study.
At the beginning of the study – and every 3 months for one year– the participants completed measures of their substance use (including alcohol and illicit drugs) and their levels of self-efficacy – how much they felt they were in control of what happens in their life.
Overall, those in the housing and supportive services group fared the best and were most likely of all three groups to have low substance use and increasing self-efficacy by the end of the study, Slesnick said.
“It was encouraging that housing plus supportive services reduced substance use and helped them develop confidence in their ability to solve problems and address the daily hassles of life,” she said.
Women in the other two groups did show some improvements in lowering substance use and improving self-efficacy. But more mothers receiving only housing increased their substance use over time compared to those receiving services-as-usual or housing and support services.
“For those young mothers just given housing, they still have a lot of stress in their lives with a child under 6. And that stress is often going to lead them to cope how they typically do, which is often with substance use,” Slesnick said.
One reason that this study is so important is that mothers dealing with substance use disorders and homelessness are often difficult to help. In an earlier study that included focus groups with homeless mothers, Slesnick and her colleagues found that many of these women were reluctant to seek help, especially in shelters, because they feared their children would be taken away from them.
That’s a key reason why a “housing first” policy that keeps mothers with their children is important, but only if it provides help to deal with substance abuse and mental health issues and gives them other assistance to get their lives on track, Slesnick said.
“The conclusion is that we just can’t put these families into housing without supports. We need to provide services that will give them better ways to cope and offer a sense of self-efficacy to manage the daily stress of life without resorting to substance use.”
Co-authors on the study came from Ohio State, Kent State University, Florida State University and Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus.
The study was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.