New! Sign up for our email newsletter on Substack.

Human Thought Runs at Just 10 Bits per Second Despite Billions of Neurons

Caltech researchers have discovered that our thought processes operate at a mere 10 bits per second—millions of times slower than our sensory systems’ ability to gather information. This striking disparity challenges our understanding of brain function and raises profound questions about neural architecture and human consciousness.

Published in Neuron | Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

The Paradox of Neural Processing

While our sensory systems process an astounding billion bits of environmental data every second, our conscious thoughts trudge along at just 10 bits per second—a rate that, as Markus Meister, the Anne P. and Benjamin F. Biaggini Professor of Biological Sciences at Caltech, notes, is “extremely low.” To put this in perspective, a typical Wi-Fi connection processes 50 million bits per second, making our thought speed seem remarkably constrained.

The research, led by graduate student Jieyu Zheng in Meister’s laboratory, employed information theory to analyze various human behaviors, from reading and writing to video gaming and Rubik’s Cube solving. Their findings present a profound paradox: despite possessing over 85 billion neurons, with one-third dedicated to high-level thinking in the cortex, our conscious thought remains surprisingly sequential and slow.

Evolutionary Insights

The researchers propose an evolutionary explanation for this cognitive limitation. Early creatures with nervous systems primarily used their brains for navigation—moving toward food and away from predators. This evolutionary heritage might explain why we can only follow one “path” of thought at a time, even in abstract thinking scenarios like chess, where players must examine possible moves sequentially rather than simultaneously.

As Zheng and Meister observe in their paper, “Our ancestors have chosen an ecological niche where the world is slow enough to make survival possible.” This adaptation suggests that our seemingly limited processing speed might have been sufficient for our evolutionary needs.

Implications for Brain-Computer Interfaces

These findings cast doubt on certain technological aspirations. Recent proposals for direct brain-computer interfaces, intended to accelerate human communication beyond conventional speeds, may face fundamental biological constraints. The study suggests that such interfaces would still be limited by the brain’s native processing speed of 10 bits per second.

Glossary

Bit
A basic unit of information in computing, representing the smallest possible piece of data.
Information Theory
A field of study that quantifies information and analyzes how it can be measured, stored, and communicated.
Neural Architecture
The structural and functional organization of neurons and their connections in the brain.

Test Your Knowledge

How many bits per second do human sensory systems process?

One billion (109) bits per second, which is 100 million times faster than our conscious thought processes.

What is the processing speed of human conscious thought?

10 bits per second, as quantified by the Caltech research team.

Why might our brains process thoughts sequentially rather than in parallel?

The research suggests this limitation may be related to our evolutionary history, where early nervous systems evolved primarily for navigation, leading to sequential path-following behavior in abstract thinking.

How does this research challenge current aspirations for brain-computer interfaces?

The discovery of the 10 bits per second processing limit suggests that even direct brain-computer interfaces would be constrained by this fundamental biological speed limit, potentially limiting their effectiveness for accelerating human communication.


Enjoy this story? Subscribe to our newsletter at scienceblog.substack.com.


Did this article help you?

If you found this piece useful, please consider supporting our work with a small, one-time or monthly donation. Your contribution enables us to continue bringing you accurate, thought-provoking science and medical news that you can trust. Independent reporting takes time, effort, and resources, and your support makes it possible for us to keep exploring the stories that matter to you. Together, we can ensure that important discoveries and developments reach the people who need them most.