Mercury in the world’s oceans: On the rise

Little was known about how much mercury in the environment was the result of human activities, or how much “bioavailable” mercury was in the world’s oceans. Until now.

The first direct calculation of mercury pollution in the world’s oceans, based on data from 12 oceanographic sampling cruises during the last eight years, is reported in this week’s issue of the journal Nature.

The scientists involved are affiliated with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) in Massachusetts, Wright State University in Ohio, the Observatoire Midi-Pyréneés in France and the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research in the Netherlands.

The research was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the European Research Council. It was led by WHOI marine chemist Carl Lamborg. The results offer a look at the global distribution of mercury in the marine environment.

“Mercury is an environmental poison that’s detectable wherever we look for it, including the ocean abyss,” says Don Rice, director of the NSF’s Chemical Oceanography Program.

“These scientists have reminded us that the problem is far from abatement, especially in regions of the world’s oceans where the human fingerprint is most distinct.”

Mercury is a naturally occurring element as well as a by-product of such human activities as burning coal and making cement.

“If we want to regulate mercury emissions into the environment and in the food we eat, we should first know how much is there and how much human activity is adding every year,” says Lamborg.

“At the moment, however, there is no way to look at a water sample and tell the difference between mercury that came from pollution and mercury that came from natural sources. Now we at least have a way to separate the bulk contributions of natural and human sources over time.”

The group started by looking at data that reveal details about ocean levels of phosphate, a substance that is better studied in the oceans than mercury and that behaves in much the same way as mercury.

Phosphate is a nutrient that, like mercury, is taken up into the marine food web by binding with organic material.

By determining the ratio of phosphate-to-mercury in water deeper than 1,000 meters (3,300 feet) that has not been in contact with Earth’s atmosphere since the Industrial Revolution, the researchers were able to estimate mercury in the oceans that originated from natural sources such as the breakdown, or weathering, of rocks on land.

Their findings agreed with what they would expect to see given the pattern of global ocean circulation.

North Atlantic waters, for example, showed the most obvious signs of mercury pollution because that’s where surface waters sink to form deep and intermediate water flows.

The tropical and Northeast Pacific, on the other hand, were relatively unaffected; it takes centuries for deep ocean water to circulate to these regions.

Determining the contribution of mercury from human activity required another step.

To obtain estimates for shallower waters and to provide numbers for the amount of mercury in the oceans, the scientists needed a tracer–a substance that could be linked with major human activities that release mercury into the environment.

They found it in one of the most well-studied gases of the past 40 years: carbon dioxide. Databases containing information on carbon dioxide in ocean waters are extensive and readily available for every ocean at all depths.

Because much of the mercury and carbon dioxide from human sources comes from the same activities, the team was able to derive with an index relating the two.

The results show that the oceans contain about 60,000 to 80,000 tons of mercury pollution.

Ocean waters shallower than about 100 meters (300 feet) have tripled in mercury concentration since the Industrial Revolution. Mercury in the oceans as a whole has increased roughly 10 percent over pre-industrial times.

“The next 50 years could very well add the same amount we’ve seen in the past 150,” says Lamborg.

“We don’t know what that means for fish and marine mammals, but likely that some fish contain at least three times more mercury than 150 years ago. It could be more.

“The key is that now we have some solid numbers on which to base continued work.”

Substack subscription form sign up
The material in this press release comes from the originating research organization. Content may be edited for style and length. Want more? Sign up for our daily email.

1 thought on “Mercury in the world’s oceans: On the rise”

  1. This study on ocean mercury gives us two good reasons for hope.

    First it points out that the total mercury in the oceans is much less than previously feared.

    Second it points out that phyto-plankton actively sequester mercury safely into the abyss for millennia.

    This latter idea is one I have been working to develop and demonstrate and have I think succeeded in doing so. My large ocean pasture restoration project in the NE Pacific in 2012 restored a vast and vital ocean pasture, reviving its ocean plankton and creating an oasis of life. Here’s just how well it worked, it brought back an extra half a billion salmon

    The phyto-plankton also created e rich broth of biological molecules. These attached to mercury and sank it in prodigious amounts to the deep abyss many miles beneath the thriving ocean pasture. There it will be safely buried for millennia. My methods and technologies are tried and true and ready to deploy to employ natural bio-remediation to remove deadly mercury from the oceans.

    Ocean pastures are becoming deserts in most of the worlds oceans. This is due to our high and rising CO2 feeding plants on land. More grass growing means less dust blowing. And it is dust that feeds ocean pastures just as rain feeds pastures on land.

    All we need to do is give back to the ocean the dust we have and are denying it and the ocean will give back to us.

Comments are closed.