Until recently, Orthacanthus gracilis could have been considered the “John Smith” of prehistoric shark names, given how common it was.
Three different species of sharks from the late Paleozoic Era – about 310 million years ago – were mistakenly given that same name, causing lots of grief to paleontologists who studied and wrote about the sharks through the years and had trouble keeping them apart.
But now (ICZN). He had to document the need to change the names, propose new names and submit them to an ICZN-recognized journal for peer review and then have the ICZN officially accept the names.
“It was one of the most complex naming problems we have had in paleontology, which is probably one reason no one attempted to fix it until now,” Babcock said.
“A lot of scientists in the field have written, thanking me for doing this. We are all happy it is finally done,” he said.
One measure of the impact the renaming has had on the field: Babcock’s paper announcing the new names was just published in the journal at Ohio State.
Babcock, who is the current director of the Orton Museum, decided to begin the renaming process after reviewing the museum’s collection. He was surprised to see how many fossils the museum had that had been collected by Newberry, including the two prehistoric sharks.
Babcock wrote about Orton’s Newberry collection in a new article published in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.
Through the years, scientists have written about how various Newberry specimens had been lost. It turns out many had been at the Orton Museum.
“No museum has a larger collection of Newberry’s fossils except for the American Museum of Natural History in New York City,” Babcock said.
“Not a lot of people are aware of that – I did not even know the extent of our collection. If you’re looking for part of the Newberry collection and can’t find it in the American Museum of Natural History, it is probably going to be here.”