One of the keys to happiness at work is earning a lot of money, but what is equally important, if not more important, is that our earnings not be inferior to those of our peers, that is, of the colleaugues we compare ourselves to. This is revealed by a study carried out at Universidad Carlos III in Madrid (UC3M) that analyzes the relationship between happiness and income from work.
The study, published by Professor Eduardo Pérez Asenjo of UC3M’s Economics Department, shows that relative earnings affect our happiness and our job performance. Summing up: if the people with whom I compare myself earn more than I do, I will be unhappier and I will work more. “This confirms the hypothesis of what I perceived, but not the way I would like things to be,” the author of the study comments. “I would find it healthier not to compare what we earn to what others earn and I think it would be ‘better’ if these things didn’t affect our happiness,” he states.
In his analysis, he found that if an individual’s earnings are less than those of her/his peers, s/he will work more hours. What causes this effect? “The most likely explanation lies in social comparisons, although it could also be due to the idea that if those around me earn more than I do, it might indicate that if I work hard I will end up earning as much as they do,” explains Professor Pérez Asenjo, who also works at the Banco de España (the National Bank of Spain). The explanation derived from empirical analysis is the first one. “Therefore, the effect of others’ earnings on my happiness is negative, because I compare myself to them and it makes me unhappy to earn less than them; so I work more hours so that I can earn the same as or more than them,” he maintains.This finding can be applied to labor management or to human resource management in companies. “It might be a relevant criterion to keep in mind, when setting salaries, that an employee is concerned not only with what s/he earns, but also with what those around her/him earn,” comments the researcher, whose perception is that a happy worker is much more productive than an unhappy one. “My personal opinion is that employees’ happiness is not really taken into account in work environments, from the company’s perspective,” he concludes.
This line of research presents many challenges and aspects that can be delved into further: How are peer groups formed? Do the effects of relative income on happiness vary with the level of income? Or with age? This researcher’s hypothesis, which is still to be tested, is that, paradoxically, the richer you are, the more important it is to compare yourselves with others and to do better than them. “If the absolute quantity of money one earns were the only thing that mattered, at a certain very high level, the only thing left would be to stop working, but that is not what happens and I think one of the reasons for this is social comparisons”, he speculates.
I think we need to be clear on how we understand what happiness is. Indeed, different culture, and at different points in time we have come to understand it in hugely varying ways.
It seems like a real trendy, governmental procedure for political bodies and policy makers to keep track of their nations level of happiness but how are we actually measuring this.
I feel like we’ve reduced happiness to a buzz word, to its minimal dimensions of being with pleasure and without pain. It implies a uniform, static, hermetically sealed existence which we all know is impossible to keep up.
Richard Schoch’s book ‘The Secret of Happiness’ which was released a couple of years ago really made me think about the extent to which governmental bodies have jumped on the happiness bandwagon without truly considering it. We seem to be born expecting happiness as a right, and are ready and willing to consume anything which is supposed to make us happier. Anyway, for those of you that haven’t heard his arguments he summarises his ideas quite nicely in this little video: http://iai.tv/video/the-myth-of-being-happy