Duke University neurobiologist Erich Jarvis and a team of 28 other neuroscientists have proposed sweeping changes to the terminology associated with the brain structures of birds–a century-old nomenclature the researchers consider outdated and irrelevant to birds’ true brainpower.
The international research group concludes in a Feb. 2005, paper published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience that significant discoveries made over time reveal that birds are much closer to mammals in cognitive ability, and therefore, a new consistency in language will enhance studies of both.
In the journal’s “Perspectives” column, authors describe a wide range of studies demonstrating that the so-called “primitive” regions of avian brains are actually sophisticated processing regions homologous to those in mammals. Those studies, which included tracing of neural pathways and behavior, showed that such avian brain regions carry out sensory processing, motor control and sensorimotor learning just as the mammalian neocortex. The scientists add that molecular studies reveal the avian and mammalian brain regions are comparable in their genetic and biochemical machinery.
In the same column, Jarvis and members of the Avian Brain Nomenclature Consortium reason that the old view of evolution in birds is no longer valid. Citing technical revisions to the nomenclature that were published in a May 2004, issue of the Journal of Comparative Neurology, consortium members assert in the new article that the old terminology–which implied that the avian brain was more primitive than the mammalian brain–has hindered scientific understanding.
“We believe that names have a powerful influence on the experiments we do and the way in which we think,” wrote the authors of the new report. “Our current understanding of the avian brain requires a new terminology that better reflects these functions and the homologies between avian and mammalian brains.”
The consortium’s efforts were supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Lead author Jarvis organized the Duke conference in 2002 that brought together the many researchers in neuroscience and neuroanatomy to undertake discussions of the needed changes.
The group believed the previous terminology and associated concepts of how to define avian brain structure and avian brain evolution stymied efforts to directly link discoveries in the avian brain with those of other mammals. Jarvis, whose seminal work in vocal learning in birds garnered him $500,000 in 2002 as recipient of NSF’s Waterman Award, acknowledged that the award came at a critical time in his work with the consortium.
“The impact of this work will go far beyond simple comparative anatomy,” Jarvis said. “There is strong interest across neuroscience in using birds as models for learning and development, and migratory and social behavior.”
The revision of the nomenclature for avian brains would replace a system developed in the 19th century by Ludwig Edinger, considered the father of comparative neuroanatomy. Edinger’s system was based on a then-common practice of combining Darwin’s recent theory of evolution and Aristotle’s old concept that there exists a natural “scale” of creatures from lowest to highest. The prevailing views became that evolution was progressive from organisms with “lower” intelligence to those with “higher” intelligence and that evolution had a purpose–the generation of humans.
In the new view, the neocortex and related areas in the mammalian brain are derived from a region in the embryonic cerebrum called the pallium, or covering, a very different conclusion from Edinger’s, which considered this region in the bird cerebrum part of the basal ganglia.
The consortium’s work actually began in 1997, and was organized by Jarvis, Anton Reiner of the University of Tennessee Health Science Center in Memphis, Martin Wild of the University of Auckland in New Zealand, and other neurobiologists, who called themselves the “ThinkTank.” Encouraging scientists to adjust their traditions and thinking based on new knowledge coming from the field had a rocky start, so the effort to change avian brain nomenclature turned into a seven-year project, with a steady add-on of new recruits. This effort culminated in the international scientific forum at Duke University in 2002, from which the new nomenclature was developed.
“We knew that we were doing something that may have an impact, not only on the immediate conduct of research in neuroscience, but on neuroscience for the next hundred years,” said Jarvis. “And this nomenclature will help people understand that evolution has created more than one way to generate complex behavior–the mammal way and the bird way. And they’re comparable to one another. In fact, some birds have evolved cognitive abilities that are far more complex than in many mammals.”
First, that’s an awesome dream. Science insights have been known to come to people in their sleep, so don’t dismiss it! Next, a ton of people probably saw your post because among others, the Wall Street Journal’s Best of the Web linked to this story. Admittedly, it was part of a larger joke about politicians, still.. Good job.
I dreamed once that I was a bird flying pretty high in a clear sky on a sunny day. Suddenly I swooped down, headfirst, very far and fast. As I dropped I realized I was dreaming, and noticed that I was perceiving speed and distance much differently than I do as a human. Though it was surprising, it made sense. It always made me think birds’ brains would *have* to be pretty complex, in some unknown-to-me way, to perceive speed and distance the way they must need to. Always meant to read up on that, but of course never had time.