Mongoose traditions shed light on evolution of human culture

A groundbreaking study of banded mongooses in Uganda has shown even small-brained animals pass on traditions, giving a valuable insight into how complex human culture could have evolved.

Scientists from the University of Exeter’s School of Biosciences studied five groups of banded mongooses, one of them made famous in the BBC TV series Banded Brothers: The Mongoose Mob. Their pioneering research observed the animals passing on traditions (namely foraging preferences) from one generation to the next, a practice previously thought to be reserved only to humans and the most intellectually advanced animals, such as primates and dolphins.

Dr Corsin Müller, lead author of the study, said the findings showed for the first time that less-advanced animals pass on traditions in the wild, which has important implications for understanding how culture can develop. He said: “We’ve shown that the basic mechanism for traditions is already found in animals of very average intellect, like mongooses. If they pass on traditions, there’s no reason to suspect most other animals wouldn’t have traditions too. This is a starting point at which traditions could evolve to become more complex and gives us an insight into how our cultures may have begun. It’s a point from which our behaviour could have evolved.”

Mongooses are better known for their unique social system which means biological parents contribute little to the raising of their young. Instead pups pick out an adult, such as an older sibling, cousin, or uncle, to be their “escort” through infancy. The pair will then spend most of their time together, with the escort caring for the young pup until it can be independent.

This led Dr Müller to wonder whether the escort was passing on traditions to their pup. Together with Dr Michael Cant, also of the University of Exeter, he devised research which would test the tradition theory by taking advantage of another mongoose trait, namely their varied eating habits.

It’s generally known that when eating prey with hard-shells, such as eggs or beetles, mongooses either bite through the outer shell or smash it on a hard surface. Each technique is equally efficient, so it’s seen as a preference. Most will stick exclusively to one method, while others may switch between the two.

For the University of Exeter research, the team created an artificial prey consisting of a plastic egg with rice and fish packed inside. By using this, Dr Müller and Dr Cant were able to monitor how 42 banded mongoose pups picked up their approach to this new item from their escorts.

According to the research, escorts stuck to their preferred method of biting or smashing, while a handful completely ignored the plastic eggs — with their preference being observed by the pups. Two months later, when the escort relationship had ended and the pups were fending for themselves, the youngsters generally followed the biting, smashing or ignoring behaviour they picked up from their escort. Even one year on, the smashers and the biters continued to preferentially display the learned behaviour.

Dr Müller added: “Our research adds to growing evidence that features which were long thought to be uniquely human actually are found, in basic forms, in animals. This is not only in our closest relatives, but even in an unspectacular animal like mongooses.

“This doesn’t make humans any less special, but it does give us an insight into how our own peculiar behaviour could come about. Humans are still unique, as is any other species.”

Contact:

Daniel Williams

Press Officer

University of Exeter

01392 722062

[email protected]

Editors notes:
The paper appeared in Current Biology and can be downloaded at: http://tiny.cc/qcd1e

This project was conducted in Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda and licensed by Uganda Wildlife Authority and Uganda National Council for Science and Technology. Funding was provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Janggen-Pöhn Stiftung and the Basler Stiftung für biologische Forschung to Dr Corsin Müller. Funding for maintenance of the study population was provided by the Natural Environment Research Council and the Royal Society to Dr Michael Cant. We would like to thank F. Mwanguhya, S. Kyabulima and K. Mwesige for help with field work, T. Clutton-Brock, H. Kunc, F. Range and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript, and Sarah Hodge for coding videos for the inter-observer reliability test.

Author contributions are as follows: Dr Corsin Müller designed and performed the research, analyzed the data and wrote the paper; Dr Michael Cant managed and maintained the long-term study population, provided logistical support, and helped to draft the manuscript.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.