Human Intervention Boosts Survival Chances for At-Risk Butterflies

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

New research offers a glimmer of hope for endangered butterfly species across the United States. A study led by Washington State University (WSU) researchers has found that at-risk butterflies have a better chance of survival when their habitats are actively managed by humans.

The study, published in the Journal of Applied Ecology, analyzed data from 114 populations of 31 butterfly species across 10 U.S. states. It reveals that while these delicate creatures face steep declines, targeted habitat management can make a significant difference in their survival rates.

The Alarming Decline of Butterfly Populations

Researchers estimate that at-risk butterfly populations are declining at a rate of 8% per year. This translates to a staggering 50% drop over a decade. The rapid decline is attributed to a combination of factors:

  1. Climate change
  2. Habitat loss
  3. Pesticide use

These findings underscore the urgent need for conservation efforts to protect these important pollinators.

The Power of Active Habitat Management

Despite the overall negative trends, the study offers a ray of hope. Dr. Cheryl Schultz, a WSU professor of conservation biology and co-lead author of the study, explains:

“The strongest signal we found is that in places where people are actively engaged with ways to manage the habitat, the butterflies are doing the best. That to me is super exciting because that means that habitat management can make a difference, even in the face of stressors like climate change.”

The research team discovered that habitat interventions such as prescribed burns, mowing, weeding, and planting nectar or host plants for butterfly caterpillars can significantly improve butterfly populations’ chances of survival.

Climate Change and Butterfly Behavior

Climate change is forcing many butterfly species to alter their seasonal activities, often becoming active earlier in the year. The study found that significant shifts in timing were generally detrimental to butterfly populations.

However, there’s good news. Dr. Collin Edwards, a recent WSU postdoctoral fellow and co-lead author, notes:

“We were excited to discover that habitat management appeared to be dampening the effect of climate change on butterfly timing. Populations that received more frequent management had smaller shifts in their timing.”

This finding suggests that while habitat management may not solve the impact of climate change entirely, it can help mitigate some of its effects on butterfly populations.

Why It Matters

The conservation of butterfly species is crucial for several reasons:

  1. Ecological balance: Butterflies play a vital role in pollination and are indicators of ecosystem health.
  2. Biodiversity: Protecting at-risk species helps maintain genetic diversity.
  3. Scientific research: Butterflies are important subjects for studying evolution, ecology, and the impacts of climate change.
  4. Cultural and aesthetic value: Many people derive joy and inspiration from observing these beautiful insects.

Dr. Elizabeth Crone, a professor at the University of California, Davis and co-author of the study, emphasizes the potential for local action:

“This might not solve the impact of climate change, but we can mediate some of the effects. It’s within our power at the local level to do something positive for these populations.”

Success Stories and Future Directions

The study included several endangered butterfly species, such as the Oregon silverspot, Taylor’s checkerspot, Karner blue, and frosted elfin. One notable success story is the Fender’s blue butterfly, which has rebounded from just a few thousand in the 1990s to over 30,000 today, thanks to collaborative efforts between researchers, public land managers, and private landowners.

Dr. Schultz encourages public participation in butterfly conservation efforts:

“We really encourage people to plant an abundance of wildflowers and plants which are both hosts for caterpillars and provide nectar for butterflies. These should be ‘clean plantings’ meaning they are pesticide free. The more we can reduce pesticides in our environment, the better it’s going to be for butterflies and insects.”

By combining scientific research, active habitat management, and community involvement, there’s hope that we can reverse the decline of these crucial and beautiful creatures.


Test Your Knowledge

  1. According to the study, at what rate are at-risk butterfly populations declining annually? a) 5% b) 8% c) 10% d) 15%
  2. Which of the following is NOT mentioned as a factor contributing to butterfly population decline? a) Climate change b) Habitat loss c) Pesticide use d) Air pollution
  3. What was the approximate increase in Fender’s blue butterfly population from the 1990s to today? a) From 2,000 to 10,000 b) From 5,000 to 20,000 c) From a few thousand to over 30,000 d) From 10,000 to 50,000

Answer Key:

  1. b) 8%
  2. d) Air pollution
  3. c) From a few thousand to over 30,000

Substack subscription form sign up