The National Cancer Advisory Board (NCAB) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) today accepted 22 strategic proposals for revamping the NCI’s cancer clinical trials system and a five-year implementation plan to accomplish the changes.
Advances in molecular medicine are the driving force behind the Clinical Trials Working Group (CTWG) recommendations. These advances offer enormous potential to improve cancer clinical practice by advancing beyond the toxic treatments of the past, but also create new challenges for the design and conduct of cancer clinical trials.
The new blueprint for the NCI’s clinical trials enterprise was submitted to the NCAB by the CTWG, a broad-based group convened in 2004 by NCI Director Andrew von Eschenbach, M.D., to advise on optimizing the NCI-supported clinical trials system. By accepting the report, the NCAB endorsed the CTWG’s recommendations to NCI.
“These recommendations propose integrating the best of all components of NCI’s clinical trials system into a cross-disciplinary, coordinated research endeavor for moving therapies to patients,” said James H. Doroshow, M.D., director, NCI Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, who spearheaded the CTWG. “This new, cooperative enterprise will be supported by a strengthened scientific infrastructure and a broadly engaged coalition of critical stakeholders.”
Along with Doroshow, CTWG members representing industry, professional associations, and institutions performing clinical investigations answered questions for NCAB members about the proposals, which were presented in a 77-page report called “Restructuring the National Cancer Clinical Trials Enterprise.”
“I greatly admire and appreciate the work of the CTWG,” said von Eschenbach. “This report and its implementation plan represent a critical step to reaching the NCI goal of ending the suffering and death due to cancer by 2015. The recommendations lead to creating a clinical research infrastructure that will unravel the molecular mysteries of human cancer and rapidly implement interventions that will preempt the cancer process.”
“This enormous potential for more specific cancer treatment, coupled with the complexity of evaluating new, highly specific agents, requires robust clinical trial designs,” said Howard Fine, M.D., chief, Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, who co-chaired the CTWG. “Development of such trials will necessitate comprehensive information sharing and close collaboration among clinical researchers and basic and translational scientists as well as scientists developing modern molecular diagnostic and imaging techniques.”
The report includes an implementation plan with a timeline and budget for each initiative, as well as a recommendation that a formal evaluation system be developed to assess the success of the restructuring effort over time.
The CTWG initiatives are organized into five categories, and in each section, the initiatives are organized into two types. New initiatives propose fundamental and significant changes in the operation of the NCI clinical trials system. Enhancement initiatives propose expansion or enhancement of activities already underway within NCI. Listed below are the five categories, with new initiatives shown in italics.
* Create a comprehensive database containing information on all NCI-funded clinical trials to facilitate better planning and management across clinical trial venues.
* Realign NCI and academic incentives to promote collaborative team science.
* Increase cooperation between NCI, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and industry to enhance the focus and efficiency of oncology drug development.
* Expand awareness of the NCI-FDA expedited approval process to speed trial initiation.
* Work with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to identify clinical studies that address both NCI and CMS objectives, and for which CMS may be able to reimburse some routine and investigational costs.
Prioritization/Scientific Quality Initiatives
* Create an Investigational Drug Steering Committee to work with NCI to enhance the design and prioritization of early-phase drug development trials.
* Create a network of Scientific Steering Committees, which leverage current Intergroup, Cooperative Group, Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (SPORE), and Cancer Center structures, to work with NCI in the design and prioritization of phase III trials to better allocate scarce resources, improve scientific quality, and reduce duplication.
* Increase community oncologist and patient advocate involvement in clinical trial design and prioritization to improve the rate of patient accrual, and better address practical and quality of life concerns in the design of trials.
* Develop a funding and prioritization process to ensure that critical correlative science and quality of life studies can be conducted in a timely manner in association with clinical trials.
* Develop a standards-setting process for the measurement, analysis, and reporting of biomarker data in association with clinical trials to enhance data comparisons, reduce duplication, and facilitate data submission for regulatory approval.
* Investigate integration of phase II trials into the overall prioritization process to further coordinate the national clinical trials system.
* Create, in partnership with the extramural cancer research community, a national cancer clinical trials information technology infrastructure fully interoperable with NCI’s cancer Bioinformatics Grid to improve cost effectiveness and comparability of results across trials and sites.
* In consultation with industry and FDA, develop standard case report forms incorporating common data elements to improve information sharing among cancer researchers and to optimize data requirements.
* Build a credentialing system for investigators and sites recognized by NCI and industry to allow faster trial initiation and keep the investigative community abreast of legal, safety, and regulatory changes.
* Develop commonly accepted clauses for clinical trial contracts with industry to reduce the lead-time needed to open trials.
Operational Efficiency Initiatives
* Restructure the phase III funding model to promote rapid patient accrual rates and cost-effectiveness.
* Reduce institutional barriers to timely trial initiation.
* Increase patient and public awareness and understanding of clinical trials.
* Increase minority patient access to clinical trials to improve the participation of underserved and underrepresented populations.
* Promote adoption of the NCI Central Institutional Review Board facilitated review process to reduce the time and resources needed to open trials at individual sites.
* Create a Clinical Trials Oversight Subcommittee of the NCAB to advise the NCI director on conduct of clinical trials across the institute.
* Develop a coordinated NCI organizational structure to manage the entire clinical trials enterprise supported by the institute.
More information about the CTWG and the full report can be found at: http://integratedtrials.nci.nih.gov.
The National Cancer Advisory Board is an oversight group that makes recommendations to NCI.