Wonk groups call on Trump, Clinton to address major science issues

A blue-ribbon coalition of fifty-six leading U.S. nonpartisan organizations, representing more than 10 million scientists and engineers, are calling on U.S. Presidential candidates to address a set of twenty major issues in science, engineering, technology, health and the environment, and encouraging journalists and voters to press the candidates on them during the 2016 U.S. Presidential election season.

“Taken collectively, these twenty issues have at least as profound an impact on voters’ lives as those more frequently covered by journalists, including candidates’ views on economic policy, foreign policy, and faith and values,” said ScienceDebate.org chair Shawn Otto, organizer of the effort. A 2015 national poll commissioned by ScienceDebate.org and Research!America revealed that a large majority of Americans (87%) say it is important that candidates for President and Congress have a basic understanding of the science informing public policy issues.

The group crowd sourced and refined hundreds of suggestions, then submitted “the 20 most important, most immediate questions” to the Presidential campaigns of Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Gary Johnson, and Jill Stein, “along with an invitation to the candidates to answer them in writing and to discuss them on television,” said Otto. The questions and answers will be widely distributed to the science community, journalists, and the general public to help voters make well-informed decisions at the ballot box this November.

The list of organizations is a who’s who of the American science enterprise.

“Sometimes politicians think science issues are limited to simply things like the budget for NASA or NIH, and they fail to realize that a President’s attitude toward and decisions about science and research affect the public wellbeing, from the growth of our economy, to education, to public health. Voters should have a chance to know where the Presidential candidates stand,” said Rush Holt, chief executive officer of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and executive publisher of the Science family of journals. “We want journalists and voters to ask these questions insistently of the candidates and their campaign staff.”

“By engaging the candidates in a debate focusing on topics in science, engineering, technology, and innovation,” said Marcia McNutt, President of the National Academy of Sciences. “it would be an opportunity for all voters to gauge how the candidates would use sound technical information in their future decision making.”

“Informing citizens about the health of the nation and discussing pivotal science and policy issues such as mental health, chronic and emerging diseases and other public health threats, and vaccine research, are important to not only advance the national dialogue but also improve the country’s overall well-being,” said Victor J. Dzau, President of the National Academy of Medicine.

“Ahead lie many Grand Challenges for Engineering whose solution in this century have been posited as necessary for simply maintaining our quality of life,” said C. D. Mote, Jr., President of the National Academy of Engineering. “Unfortunately, these challenges stand unrecognized in the US Presidential debates.”

The groups are asking candidates to provide responses by September 6.

Nonpartisan organizations participating in the effort include:

  • **ScienceDebate.org
  • *American Association for the Advancement of Science
  • American Association of Geographers
  • *American Chemical Society
  • American Fisheries Society
  • American Geophysical Union
  • *American Geosciences Institute
  • *American Institute of Biological Sciences
  • American Institute of Professional Geologists
  • American Rock Mechanics Association
  • American Society for Engineering Education
  • American Society of Agronomy
  • American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
  • American Society of Mammalogists
  • American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering
  • Association for Women in Geosciences
  • Association of Ecosystem Research Centers
  • Automation Federation
  • *Biophysical Society
  • Botanical Society of America
  • Carnegie Institution for Science
  • Conservation Lands Foundation
  • Crop Science Society of America
  • Duke University
  • Ecological Society of America
  • Geological Society of America
  • *IEEE-USA
  • International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies
  • Materials Research Society
  • NACE International, The Worldwide Corrosion Authority
  • *National Academy of Engineering
  • *National Academy of Medicine
  • *National Academy of Sciences
  • National Cave and Karst Research Institute
  • *National Center for Science Education
  • National Ground Water Association
  • Natural Science Collections Alliance
  • Northeastern University
  • Organization of Biological Field Stations
  • Paleontological Society
  • *Research!America
  • Scientific American magazine
  • Seismological Society of America
  • *Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society
  • Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections
  • Society of Fire Protection Engineers
  • Society of Wetland Scientists
  • Society of Women Engineers
  • Soil Science Society of America
  • SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
  • Tufts University
  • *Union of Concerned Scientists
  • University City Science Center
  • *U.S. Council on Competitiveness
  • The Wildlife Society
  • World Endometriosis Research Foundation America

*Codeveloper of the questions
**Lead partner organization

The consortium’s list of 20 questions are available online at ScienceDebate.org/20qs.

1 COMMENT

  1. Read my lips :-) I am NOT saying Trump can “Make America Great Again” but this is what he means my that statement.
    We only see America’s greatness thru our own current life span. Trump is 70 years old so like me he saw the 60s and 70s. Back then America put a man on the moon.Now we hitchhike with the Russians, just to go to the space station. We were going to build the world’s largest super collider in texas. And with it would have found the higgs boson 10 years ago. America was building a hyper space plane that would have soared into space instead of a rocket. All canceled when economy went south.
    When I graduated from highschool, I took three really REALLY good paying manufacturing jobs one right after anouther, on the same day. Then quit the third one three days later and they rehired me at the first place. The economy was great!

    don’t know about you but I worked from 1965 to 2005, so I experienced all those economic years and ups and downs. Experience trumps about everything else.
    Trump want those type of big science projects back

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.