Last updated: 18 September 2026
Science Blog explains research for curious readers. Our job is to show what researchers found, how they found it, what the evidence can support and what remains uncertain.
Reading the evidence
We work from the closest available source. Where practical, that means the research paper, preprint, dataset, trial record or official scientific report rather than a summary of it. We link the material that matters to the story.
We identify the status and shape of the evidence when it affects interpretation: peer review or preprint, observational study or experiment, human participants or model organisms, sample size, comparison group and material limitations. We distinguish correlation from causation and a plausible mechanism from a demonstrated one.
Headlines and summaries must reflect the strength and scope of the finding. A single study is not presented as scientific consensus, and preliminary work is not presented as settled fact.
From research to story
Science Blog aims to make technical work understandable without removing the qualifications that make it accurate. We explain the finding, the method or mechanism behind it and why it matters.
Research announcements, university material and news releases can help us locate a story, but publication by an institution is not treated as independent validation. Quotations and outside reporting are attributed. We say that we interviewed, contacted or investigated something only when we did.
Health and medical coverage is informational, not personal medical advice. We add appropriate context and links to qualified advice where a reader could otherwise mistake a research finding for a treatment recommendation.
Authors, editors and AI tools
A named byline is the person who approved publication under that name, including any personal material attributed to them. A house column or the Science Blog Editorial Team byline is a desk of the publication.
AI is used in research, drafting, editing and checks, and may produce much of an initial draft. A member of our team reviews and approves every article and is responsible for its sources, attribution, claims and final presentation.
Sources and quotations come from the material we cite. First-hand reporting is described as such only when it happened.
Corrections and substantive updates
We correct material errors promptly. Material corrections and substantial revisions carry a dated note explaining what changed. Minor fixes that do not alter what readers were told may be made without one. If an article’s central premise cannot be supported, we withdraw it and leave a notice at the original address where appropriate.
Historical material
Science Blog has published since 2002, and its archive spans earlier owners, community contributions, institutional material and different editorial systems. Current ownership does not imply that every archived article was produced or reviewed under today’s process.
We preserve original publication dates. We show an updated date only for substantive editorial work, and we add a note when a material change would matter to readers.
Independence and contact
Science Blog is published by Brown Brothers Media Pte. Ltd. and funded primarily by display advertising. Advertisers, sponsors and commercial partners do not determine our editorial conclusions. Affiliate links and recommendations involving Brown Brothers Media, its founders, staff or their families are disclosed in the article near the recommendation.
For corrections, email [email protected]. For source questions or enquiries about editorial practices, email [email protected].
Brown Brothers Media’s editorial framework is the network-level statement governing these standards where this page is silent.