Long before NAC saved the life of someone dear to me, it was a staple of my supplement stack. I notice that now N-Acetyl Cysteine has become my favorite supplement, the one I reach for 3 or 4 times a day when I pass the kitchen cabinet. It’s been such a gradual process, that I don’t remember the reasons that installed NAC in my subconscious as a reliable life extension aid. I’m taking this opportunity to review the literature.
In the 1980s and 1990s, the oxidative theory of aging reached its pinnacle, and anti-oxidant supplements were all the rage. Trials of anti-aging supplements failed time and again, and often they led to shorter lifespans of test animals. Aging of animals turns out to be more complicated than rusting of iron, and part of the complication is hormesis, and ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species), particularly H2O2, are part of the signaling cascade that turns on hormetic protections.
One anti-oxidant that survived the massacre was glutathione. I continue to believe that glutathione promotes health, despite its close association with H2O2. Supplementing with N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) is the commonly-recommended strategy for raising glutathione levels, and it seems to work. The best promise of NAC (through glutathione) is in preserving our mitochondria, which weaken and reduce in number as we age.
Chemistry
Glutathione is a tripeptide, a mini-protein consisting of the 3 amino acids glutamate, cysteine, and glycine.
Our metabolisms (like all eukaryotes) use REDOX reactions to store and deploy energy, because they are far more energy-dense than the covalent chemistry of organic molecules. The energy metabolism has waste products which must be neutralized so they don’t latch on to delicate organic molecules and damage them. There are various toxic waste products (ROS), and various pathways for reducing them. The last stage is always H2O2, which must be neutralized to water. This is the primary job of glutathione. (Also catalase.) Unlike catalase, glutathione can perform diverse other detoxifying roles as well.
Glutathione acts like a rechargeable battery. Its reduced form (GSH) is available to detoxify H2O2, after which it exists as an oxidized form (GSSG), which must be “recharged”. GSSG is just two molecules of glutathione that are linked together by a disulfide bond, and a more complex protein called glutathione reductase comes along to separate the two molecules, recharging the battery. Another supplement, Alpha Lipoic Acid (ALA) is also helpful in recycling GSSG back to its useful form, GSH. Cells sense the ratio of GSH to GSSG to determine if they are in trouble. If the ratio becomes too low, the cell turns on NFkB [ref], which, in turn, initiates an inflammation cascade. A healthy cell has GSH:GSSG in the ratio 100 to 1, but a severely stressed sell can have more GSSG than GSH. Low ratios GSH:GSSG ratios can send a cell down a senescence pathway, terminating in apoptosis.

Glutathione’s importance is underscored by its large concentrations in every cell in the body. Your average human cell is using glucose for fuel, but the cell has as much glutathione as glucose in the cytoplasm.
Glutathione levels normally decline with age.
In addition to anti-oxidant activity, glutathione is now known to have many other roles, including DNA repair, protein synthesis, and chemical signaling. These functions may be even more important than detoxifying H2O2. Most important for slowing age-related degeneration, glutathione has anti-inflammatory effects [ref], especially in the lungs [ref], which may be why NAC has been helpful in protecting against COVID [ref] It is well-established that severe COVID depletes glutathione, especially in late stages involving a cytokine storm [ref].
Table 1 Functions of Glutathione |
|
Table from J Pizzorno [2014]
Dietary Glutathione
Fruits and vegetables are a substantial source of dietary glutathione [ref], but bioavailability is low, so most of the body’s glutathione is home-made.
Can you just take glutathione pills? Yes, but they are expensive and poorly absorbed. Does supplementation with NAC really increase availability of glutathione where it is useful? Evidence is good [ref, ref, ref]. Just two years ago, I advised readers of this blog to eat glutathione, but I’m backing off from that suggestion now, because I think NAC supplementation is not just cheaper but more effective.
“The rate-limiting step of glutathione synthesis does not appear to be the activity of either enzyme under normal conditions, but rather the provision of one of the amino acids (L-cysteine) making up the tripeptide.” [ref]
Agricultural and industrial chemicals, ubiquitous in our environment, are not the primary cause of aging, but they cause severe symptoms for some, and may be degrading the metabolisms for all of us in subtle ways. Glyphosate has become impossible to avoid. Glyphosate, mercury, and other chemicals increase the body’s need for glutathione, as glutathione is essential to the body’s detox machinery. IBS, Crohn’s disease, and other inflammation syndromes increase the need for glutathione, and can potentially benefit from NAC supplementation.
What benefits of NAC have been documented in humans?
Best evidence is for preservation of the eyes with age. This is from an article on eye health and aging by BIll Sardi:
Numerous studies link glutathione with the prevention of cataracts, glaucoma, retinal disease and diabetic blindness. Here is a sampling of the evidence concerning glutathione and eye health.
Glutathione has been shown to detoxify the aqueous fluid of the inner eye [ref] and may help maintain adequate fluid outflow among glaucoma patients. [ref, ref]
Glutathione exists in unusually high concentrations in the lens and is essential to maintain its transparency. [ref] However, glutathione levels decline in the lens with advancing age; the decline is especially rapid prior to cataract formation. [ref]
NAC has been observed to have neuroprotective properties, but whether it lowers risk of dementia or PD is still not established [ref]. Emerging evidence suggests that NAC supplementation protects the brain in the event of ischemic stroke [ref]. Intravenous glutathione has been tried as a therapy for Parkinson’s disease with unimpressive results. Psychiatric applications are still under development. NAC has shown promise for treating addiction, AD, PD, autism, OCD, schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder [ref].
Infusion of NAC increased endurance in trained cyclists [ref].
Intravenous NAC is used in ERs for detoxification of acetaminophen. It is also used for heavy metals [ref, ref], chloroform, monoxide and other poisons. [ref]
Table 2 Diseases Associated with GSH Depletion |
|
Table from J Pizzorno [2014]
Old mice have half as much glutathione in their muscles, compared to young mice [ref]
Life extension in lab animals, including rodents
There are many studies in worms and flies demonstrating life extension via NAC. There is just one study in mice [ref], but it was so successful that I don’t know why it hasn’t been replicated. 24% increase in mean lifespan and 45% increase in maximal lifespan in the only arm of this Jackson Lab broad screening study that showed promise.
FDA regulation
Glutathione and NAC have both been readily available supplements, available without prescription for many years. NAC is preferred as a less expensive pathway to augmenting GSH levels within cells. Recently, NAC was reclassified as a prescription drug by FDA. There is no concern with safety, and the only reason offered by FDA is that NAC has been promoted as a hangover remedy after excess alcohol consumption. Since glutathione can detoxify alcohol breakdown products in the liver, NAC probably has some usefulness in this role. I believe the real motivation for making NAC harder to get is that it is useful in treating COVID, and there appears to be an agenda for suppressing inexpensive and effective treatments (chloroquine, ivermectin, vitamin D, zinc, quercetin) in favor of vaccination.
(Off-topic: If you’re interested in a comprehensive guide to the general principles and the subtleties treating COVID, I highly recommend this interview by of Mumbai.)
The Bottom Line
The evidence for NAC as a life extension supplement is mostly indirect, but there are many good reasons to boost our glutathione levels, especially as we age, and especially in an age of ubiquitous chemical toxins.
Discussion
89 reader comments
Imported threads are marked Archive. New comments are welcome and moderated for spam.
A word of caution:
https://www.longecity.org/forum/topic/106902-n-acetyl-cysteine-a-warning-shot-by-derek-lowe/
sorry, forgot link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23000913/
Has anyone tried NACET? It seems exorbitantly priced, but apparently far superior to regular NAC
I have seen good reports and studies on black cumin seed oil (nigella sativa) as a more effective glutathione precursor/inducer (thymoquinone). Does anyone know or what doses might rival the good effects of NAC and glycine? I didn't know the need for glycine but now I'll add it with my NAC. I also think milk thistle is in this class. Thanks.
BTW, baicalein enhances milk thistle bioavailabiltiy. See ---
Baicalein Enhances the Oral Bioavailability and Hepatoprotective Effects of Silybin Through the Inhibition of Efflux Transporters BCRP and MRP2
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212553/
A disturbing item just published --
"Dietary thiols accelerate aging of C. elegans"
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24634-3
Abstract:
Glutathione (GSH) is the most abundant cellular antioxidant. As reactive oxygen species (ROS) are widely believed to promote aging and age-related diseases, and antioxidants can neutralize ROS, it follows that GSH and its precursor, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), are among the most popular dietary supplements. However, the long- term effects of GSH or NAC on healthy animals have not been thoroughly investigated. We employed C. elegans to demonstrate that chronic administration of GSH or NAC to young or aged animals perturbs global gene expression, inhibits skn-1-mediated transcription, and accelerates aging. In contrast, limiting the consumption of dietary thiols, including those naturally derived from the microbiota, extended lifespan. Pharmacological GSH restriction activates the unfolded protein response and increases proteotoxic stress resistance in worms and human cells. It is thus advantageous for healthy individuals to avoid excessive dietary antioxidants and, instead, rely on intrinsic GSH biosynthesis, which is fine-tuned to match the cellular redox status and to promote homeostatic ROS signaling.
Sobering; a good caution.
I would look to see if this is true in any other animals than worms.
I tried taking NAC for several reasons . 600 mg. I have the most horrible itching right now. Was up till 4:30 am. Exhausted. Stopped taking it today but still itching so badly, cannot sleep. Feel so disapointed I cannot take this "wonder" supplement. How does it take to leave my body? I am also allergic to cabbage and bactrim. Thought there might be a connection as NAC has sulphur or sulpha in it. Would welcome any thoughts on this, thank you.
1) You said that I said: "So capitalism only has 1 century of experience, but Marx studied it in depth 2 centuries ago? I think you need to go back to the drawing board with your economic ideas."
If I said 1 century it is of course a lapsus. Do not cling to a burning nail instead of really discussing the subject seriously. I find many of you the USrs too susceptible and dogmatic about your capitalist savage too individualist focused system. You do not resist even saying everything evolves, and of course your system will evolve too. End of history is just stupid egolatry.
2. And the ‘fact’ of mtDNA integration in the genome being the cause of aging is also questionable IMO. I never pretend it is "the" cause of aging. ªJust one (main) relevant cause of aging among various ones (I dedicated a whole theoretical paper precisely to tell dogamtics that thee are various causes previously and erroneously called "theories of aging" or unconnected "hallmarks" Please see : "Barja G. Towards a unified mechanistic theory of Aging. Exper. Gerontol. 2019". I suppose you did not see it since you pretend that I said there is only one cause of aging, be it mitROSp and derived mtDNA fragments or whatever..(I am sure of DBI of membrane FAs involvment too. These two are the one with more evidence between species (the "big effect")
Gustavo, I am fully aware of the power of vitamin D. In fact, my own critically low vitamin D status brought me onto my personal journey towards health and longevity more than a decade ago
I can tell you many stories of people, with mild SARS-CoV-2 infections, who are still struggling with neurological symptoms like chronic headache, loss of memory, concentration plus loss of smell and taste.
These persons had normal vitamin D status and were not hospitalized or feeling very sick with breathing difficulties etc. I'm sure most, if not all of them, would have preferred an mRNA vaccine, had it been available in march 2020.
Even if everyone on the planet had adequate levels of vitamin D, Zinc vitamin C, B vitamins and vitamin K, you still have the problem with a huge group of elderly suffering immunosenescence
You can't just ask old people to treat themselves at home with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. They are prescription drugs and need careful monitoring of patients, which brings me back to the whole point, that no hospital in the world is scaled for a pandemic.
Governments around the world had to look for ways to reduce hospitalization, and only a safe and effective vaccine would do just that. Forget about big pharma, conspiracy theories and let's get real.
I agree that no-one can tell for sure, what is going to happen 5 or 10 years down the road with people, who are mRNA vaccinated (which btw includes myself). It's a gamble, but so are the traditional vaccines from AstraZeneca and J&J too.
Elite athletes are always an interesting group to focus on, as even the slightest drop in performance will be noticed. I've been unable to find any evidence indicating that the mRNA vaccines causes vascular issues due to the spike protein.
I'm quite sure that even an insignificant drop in VO2MAX would have been noticed. Readers, who can dig up more information, than I have been able to, are more than welcome to share
Gustavo, I am fully aware of the power of vitamin D. In fact, my own critically low vitamin D status brought me onto my personal journey towards health and longevity more than a decade ago
I can tell you several stories of people, with mild SARS-CoV-2 infections, who are still struggling with neurological symptoms like constant headache, loss of memory, concentration plus loss of smell and taste.
These people had normal vitamin D status and were not hospitalized or feeling very sick with breathing difficulties etc. I'm sure most, if not all of them, would have preferred an mRNA vaccine, had it been available in march 2020.
Even if everyone on the planet had adequate levels of vitamin D, Zinc vitamin C, B vitamins and vitamin K, you still have the problem with a huge group of elderly suffering immunosenescence
You can't just ask old people to treat themselves at home with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. They are prescription drugs and need careful monitoring of patients, which brings me back to the whole point, that no hospital in the world is scaled for a pandemic.
Governments around the world had to look for ways to reduce hospitalization, and only a safe and effective vaccine would do just that. Forget about big pharma and other conspiracy theories and let's get real.
I agree that no-one can tell for sure, what is going to happen 5 or 10 years down the road with people, who are mRNA vaccinated (which btw includes myself). It's a gamble, but so are the real viral infection and the traditional vaccines from AstraZeneca and J&J too.
Elite athletes are always an interesting group to focus on, as even the slightest drop in performance will be noticed. I've been unable to find any evidence indicating that the mRNA vaccines causes vascular issues due to the spike protein. I'm quite sure that even an insignificant drop in VO2MAX would have been noticed. Readers, who can dig up more information, than I have been able to, are more than welcome to share it,
I do not agree with you Ole in almost all you said. Briefly:
1) I spoke about 50% of Spanish people older than 65 years of age DO ARE vitamin D deficient. In these correcting the vD deficiency and thus their 2dary immunodefociency vith vitamin D will be much more efficient than ANY vaccine. But Big Pharma does not want vitamins and minerals from 100 years back simply because they cannot be patented and they cannot make profits like they do with their much more risky synthetic drugs. Ask the 40 bosses of Pharmacy (I eat with them from time to time). They do not take any drug from the pharmacy and they commonly discuss riubd the private table how much should one take of magnessium of vitamkn D of vitamin C etc. And most of these Academy of Pharmacy members die well past 90 years. They know well also that doses have been studied for adults and for children but not for the old...Do you know ho many old die each year due to paracetamol and its irrespinsible ignorance driven use promoted by ignorant Spanish doctors? Too many are recommending paracetamol just after Asteazeneca vaccine to "peevent coagulation"!!! ignoring that paracetamol, at variance with aspirin , is not anticoagulant!!! How do you explain such widespread functionsl medical analphabetism widespeead among spNish Drs. without recurring to the Huge Power and Abuse of Big Pharma?
2) And why not use Vitamin D plus good va cines? The obssesion with vaccines ONLY denounces dirty poweeful ones...
3) You said "medium and long term effects of mRNA vacines same as J & J and Astrazeneca". But obviuosly not the same as one century old well known safe attenuated vaccines. The Chinese used them and are free and producing economy from covid in spite of being 1500 million people while the west has been stagnant last 10 months or more...
4) You stated that "only safe & effective vaccines can decrease covid serious patients needing hospitalization etc". That is FALSE as it has been recently demonstrated st Hospital del Mar Barcelona in a study of vitamin D treatment vs. Controls at covid ICU patients. Published and accepted as I already gave citation on Josh's blog.
I likely forget many other wrong subjects on your comment (I am speaking by memory)
Gustavo, you did not comment on my view regarding elite athletes and mRNA vaccines.
Most, if not all, athletes have now been vaccinated for the Olympic games in Japan this year, and I have yet to find one single scientific paper, or even anecdotal evidence that the mRNA vaccines would cause similar vascular damages that have been observed from benign COVID19 infections.
On the contrary, I've seen several studies with MRI scans from people with mild COVID19 infection, showing severe vascular damages to heart, lung and brain.
I mentioned mRNA being retro-transcribed to DNA fragments which insert/integrate in genomic DNA. The effects of this are expected to be accelerated aging (it is exactly the same mechanism by hwich mitROSp cause aging through nucleus), not acute changes including vascular ones you mention in athletes. Thus early cancer type II diabetes, Alzheimer´s and Parkinson´s diseases are expected. No one will be able to prove thus cause-effect and mRNA vaccines Pharma Cos will be able to issue to the market their new 30 mRNA based drugs which will be approved based on mRNA being "proved" safe because it was given as vaccine to 1,000 million people or more..
The final result will be corruption of the genetic constitution, likely for generations since the fragments also get into testicle and ovaries germinal line, of ONLY WESTERN people, whereas the Chinese will be essentially clean with their attenuated virus classical vaccines.
If that wrong panorama really happens it will be a further example on how competition ONLYZÑ is an erroneous auto-destructive system. I know well from 41 years of teaching Comparative Animal Physiology that there are marvelous adaptations but all of them have side effects:. In other words: there is not advantage without disadvantage in nature. And human societies have repeatedly proved to be much more stupid than mother nature which has already 4,000 million years of experience while stupidly proud humans including capitalist ("ridiculously absurdly pretending to be "the end of history"-Fukuyima USA promoted) have just a century and some nanOsecond experience at evolutionary scale.. This includes of course simplistic ideas on feee market "invisible hand" myth (,Milton Friedmand's) which lead to repeated cyclic crises and monopolistic concentration of Capital (rightly predicted by Karl Marx almost two centuries ago on his well based deep study of capitalism) unless
REGULATED.
All good trained economists know these truths although many conceal them to favor the greediness of their privileged patrons.
There is plenty of evidence that SARS-CoV-2 can integrate with human DNA, but 0 (ZERO) evidence whatsoever, that the Pfizer/BionTech mRNA vaccine (or gene therapy, if you prefer that wording) acts in a similar fashion.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/05/further-evidence-offered-claim-genes-pandemic-coronavirus-can-integrate-human-dna
But at least we can agree to disagree :-)
So capitalism only has 1 century of experience, but Marx studied it in depth 2 centuries ago? I think you need to go back to the drawing board with your economic ideas. And the 'fact' of mtDNA integration in the genome being the cause of aging is also questionable IMO.
OLE SAID: "one has to decide, if getting a very small amount of synthetic mRNA into a shoulder muscle is worse than getting infected with the real viral mRNA (which by the way has the ability to replicate inside your body for days before symptoms show up). And no, vitamin D, B vitamins, zinc, quercetin, vitamin C etc. will not make you immune to SARS-CoV-2,"
I THINK YOU ARE WRONG OLE.
Vitamin D is not really a vitamin but a hormone that changes gene expression of hundreds of genes.
Vaccine tries to increase the inmunity of inmuno-depressed people due to vitamin D deficiency...so it is not possible to do that 100%, whereas vitamin D supplementation does correct by 100% such vitamin D-induced secondary inmuno-deficiency (it affects more than 50% of Spanish people oler than 65 years of age)
I think vitamin D (plus vitamin K2 + Magnessium) appropriate supplementation (obviously not the ridiculous fake RDA) is more powerful against the coronavirus than the vaccines (95% effective but....at 3 weeks...and 47% effective at 6 months?) in old inmuno-deficient people due to vitamin D deficiency (and ¡it is that people that died majoritarily at least in Spain)
Concerning young people, most are immune competent and do not need anything to get rid of coronavirus. That is why I consider extremely dangerous and non justified tom inject mRNA based vaccines to 12 years old children!
Immune system is stronger than any vaccine. If you have a strong immune system you are protected not only against coronavirus but against hundreds of diseases. Therefore, given that efficacy has been already demonstrated last week at Hospital del Mar Barcelona in 930 patients, I consider "criminal by omission" not to use vitamin D supplementation IN THE OLD PEOPLE to fight coronavirus (because that omission is responsible for thousands of old people deaths). Why governments forgot about all kinds of treatments and are now priests of vaccine-only? Why in Spanish TV there is only a single thinking about covid treatment and the same five medical doctors (not scientists) appear in all TV chains, public or private
Why after contacting various TVs they said they understand the relevance of my claims but they were afraid to be fIred if they invited scientists to tell ANYTHING ON TV DIFFERENT THAN THE SINGLE THINKING OF THE GOVERNMENT
FINALLY, VITAMINS AND MINERALS ARE NATURAL PRODUCTS WITHOUT SIDE EFFECTS AT VARIANCE WITH SYNTHETIC DRUGS AND m-RNA based vaccines and..
Why not use vitamin D + safe vaccines? Why any information on vitamin D as a good fight against covid-19 is forbidden in our TVs in Spain?
Why they do not want to use BOTH vitamin D and the vaccines? They are not alternatives at all. They are fully compatible.! Then why they avoid vitamins since already one century? OnlY because being natural products they cannot be patented?
So they reason they ban vitamin D is that they do not want to disturb BIG PHARMA?
THEN WHERE IS DEMOCRACY IF BIG PHARMA HAS MORE POWER THAN OUR ELECTED GOVERNMENTS?
Comments on this blog are not showing up, I had to connect thru a VPN to see the comments.
Josh please look into it.
Kunal, I've emailed Josh about the same issue. Comments are not showing up. Pls fix.
Hi, I had the same exact issue. I posted some comments which didn't appear and also I could not see other comments. As it turns out, I said nothing of consequence that everyone else didn't say!
Josh and cols.,
PLEASE SEE new PAPER:
HARRIS P AND COLS., ANOTHER NEW COMER TO THE PROGRAM AGING BELIEVERS "RELIGION", stopping adhering to the non-programed stochastic wear and theories of aging?:
Treaster et al and Harris P Frontiers in Genetics (2021) Footprints in the Sand:
Deep Taxonomic Comparisons in Vertebrate Genomics to Unveil the Genetic Programs of Human Longevity