The universe’s expansion rate has presented astronomers with an intriguing mystery: it’s growing faster today than expected based on its cosmic infancy. Now, the James Webb Space Telescope has provided compelling new evidence that this disparity isn’t due to measurement errors, but might instead point to undiscovered physics that could reshape our understanding of the cosmos.
Published in The Astrophysical Journal | Estimated reading time: 5 minutes
“The discrepancy between the observed expansion rate of the universe and the predictions of the standard model suggests that our understanding of the universe may be incomplete,” says Nobel laureate Adam Riess, Bloomberg Distinguished Professor and Thomas J. Barber Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Johns Hopkins University, who led the research. “With two NASA flagship telescopes now confirming each other’s findings, we must take this [Hubble tension] problem very seriously—it’s a challenge but also an incredible opportunity to learn more about our universe.”
This cosmic conundrum, known as the Hubble tension, emerges from a persistent mismatch between two ways of measuring the universe’s expansion rate. Observations of the present-day universe consistently yield higher values compared to predictions based on the universe’s early conditions. The difference might seem small—just 5-6 kilometers per second per megaparsec—but it’s far too large to dismiss as a mere measurement error.
Using Webb’s unprecedented infrared vision, Riess’s team analyzed distances to galaxies that previously hosted supernovae, employing three distinct measurement methods. The results aligned remarkably well with earlier Hubble Space Telescope measurements, effectively ruling out telescope error as the source of the tension. As Johns Hopkins graduate student Siyang Li notes, “The Webb data is like looking at the universe in high definition for the first time and really improves the signal-to-noise of the measurements.”
The implications of this discovery extend far beyond mere numbers. While the expansion rate, known as the Hubble constant, doesn’t affect our daily lives or even our solar system, it serves as a crucial key to understanding the universe’s structure and evolution since the Big Bang, some 13-14 billion years ago. The persistent tension between measurements might point to missing pieces in our cosmic understanding, such as previously unknown forms of matter or energy that influenced the universe’s early expansion.
Glossary
- Hubble tension: The unexplained discrepancy between different methods of measuring the universe’s expansion rate, suggesting potential gaps in our understanding of cosmic physics.
- Megaparsec: A vast unit of astronomical distance equal to 3.26 million light-years, with one light-year being the distance light travels in one year (9.4 trillion kilometers).
- Standard model of cosmology: The widely accepted framework explaining how the universe works, calibrated using data from the cosmic microwave background radiation.
Test Your Knowledge
What is the primary difference between the predicted and observed expansion rates of the universe?
While the standard model predicts 67-68 kilometers per second per megaparsec, observations show 70-76, with a mean of 73 km/s/Mpc.
Why is the Webb telescope’s confirmation of Hubble’s measurements significant?
It rules out telescope measurement error as the source of the Hubble tension, suggesting the discrepancy may be due to unknown physics.
What methods did researchers use to verify their measurements?
They used three different methods to measure distances, including analysis of Cepheid variables, carbon-rich stars, and the brightest red giants across the same galaxies.
How might the Hubble tension be resolved according to current theoretical proposals?
Potential explanations include early dark energy, exotic particles, changing electron mass, primordial magnetic fields, or unusual dark matter properties affecting the universe’s early expansion.
Enjoy this story? Subscribe to our newsletter at scienceblog.substack.com.
