OK. So the experiment that I usually hear cited about this concept of the Observation changing the actions of particles observed, also tend to explain that the light photons needed to observe the object are what change its course. If this is so, itsn’t a leap in logic to say that You can’t observe an object without affecting it? Doesn’t it make more sense to say, “That until we can observe the object in ambient lighting.. We Can’t observe it without changing it’s behavior”? Once the light is taken out of the equation or balanced out somehow, won’t we probably find out that you can in fact observe an object without affecting its behavior?
If our reporting has informed or inspired you, please consider making a donation. Every contribution, no matter the size, empowers us to continue delivering accurate, engaging, and trustworthy science and medical news. Independent journalism requires time, effort, and resources—your support ensures we can keep uncovering the stories that matter most to you.
Join us in making knowledge accessible and impactful. Thank you for standing with us!