Yale researchers compared two markers for acute kidney injury (AKI), an increasingly common condition affecting thousands of hospitalized patients each year. The Yale team members and their co-authors found that a less commonly used, but more accurate, test may better define this condition, leading to improvements in research and care.
AKI, an abrupt loss of kidney function, is most often defined by testing levels of serum creatinine (SCr), a chemical waste product that increases in the blood when kidneys function abnormally. However, the SCr tends to rise late in the course of disease, putting patients at risk for morbidity and death.
Lead author Dr. Chirag Parikh, director of the Program of Applied Translational Research at Yale School of Medicine, and the team compared data collected from hospitals treating children undergoing cardiac surgery, which raised their risk for AKI. They compared postoperative outcome associations for patients diagnosed by either SCr or Cystatin C (CysC), an alternative marker for kidney function.
The researchers found that AKI defined by acute CysC elevation was more strongly associated with two key proteins that serve as biomarkers for kidney injury. While more research is needed, the findings suggest that CysC is a more precise indicator of true acute kidney injury than SCr, and that, combined, the two tests may help clinicians identify and treat AKI patients sooner.
ScienceBlog.com has no paywalls, no sponsored content, and no agenda beyond getting the science right. Every story here is written to inform, not to impress an advertiser or push a point of view.
Good science journalism takes time — reading the papers, checking the claims, finding researchers who can put findings in context. We do that work because we think it matters.
If you find this site useful, consider supporting it with a donation. Even a few dollars a month helps keep the coverage independent and free for everyone.