New! Sign up for our email newsletter on Substack.

Global Warming: Life as We’ll Know It

From George Mason University’s History News Network: “Global warming,” which may regionally include cooling, drying, humidification, or changes in the seasonality of winds and precipitation, is only one dynamic factor among many contributing to the constant flux of the biosphere. Another factor that will inevitably interact with any climate trend is the continuing redistribution of biota.

Organisms besides humans are affected by climate change, regardless of its causes. If average temperatures rise in the Arctic Ocean and the pack ice shrinks, polar bears and some seals lose habitat. If pack ice becomes rare enough, these animals will be at an ecological, and therefore evolutionary, disadvantage. They might even “blink out” altogether.”

… As exemplified by the polar bears, climate change puts the existing biota of any set “place” on the map at mounting risk of being selected against. As prevailing conditions change, adaptations that once promoted survival become irrelevant or even disadvantageous. As far as polar bears are concerned, once the ice melts, “there is no ‘there,’ there.” When abiotic factors shift, biotic ones must shift as well. When it happens too quickly for evolutionary adjustments to occur within populations, other populations – outside populations – better equipped to meet the new challenges may take advantage of the opportunity.

Written by Matt Chew (info – 2nd entry) of Arizona State University and continued at “Global Warming: Life as We’ll Know It

[Ecology, Extinction, Environment, Evolution, Science, Biology]
——-

See “The End of Eden: Gaia and James Lovelock*” at the Washington Post.

John Latter / Jorolat
Evolution Research
http://evomech3.blogspot.com/

Technorati: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Quick Note Before You Read On.

ScienceBlog.com has no paywalls, no sponsored content, and no agenda beyond getting the science right. Every story here is written to inform, not to impress an advertiser or push a point of view.

Good science journalism takes time — reading the papers, checking the claims, finding researchers who can put findings in context. We do that work because we think it matters.

If you find this site useful, consider supporting it with a donation. Even a few dollars a month helps keep the coverage independent and free for everyone.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.