The development of a vaccine that could prevent most cases of cervical cancer is such good news that even the usual suspects among the religious zealots who influence Bush administration policy didn’t try to stop yesterday’s FDA approval.
The catch with this vaccine, aside from its expense, is that for it to be effective it must be given before a girl engages in sex. There are still many influential people and organizations who object to this vaccine, to the “morning-after pill” and to education about condoms because it might give girls bad ideas they never would have entertained before.
These people would rather see more abortions, more unwanted children living in poverty and more deaths from cervical cancer than let women enjoy sex without their permission. If they think young people decide whether to have sex based on regulations or epidemiological studies, then the discussion should be framed as a mental health one.
ScienceBlog.com has no paywalls, no sponsored content, and no agenda beyond getting the science right. Every story here is written to inform, not to impress an advertiser or push a point of view.
Good science journalism takes time — reading the papers, checking the claims, finding researchers who can put findings in context. We do that work because we think it matters.
If you find this site useful, consider supporting it with a donation. Even a few dollars a month helps keep the coverage independent and free for everyone.
I wish people could set aside their “morals” and just understand the issue. Something that occurs at a rate of 80% in the population, such as HPV, is something that comes with the terrain of being a living person. It’s a high enough rate that using good “moral judgement” alone is not going to protect you from it. Too bad we have a government that thinks science is sacrilege instead of one that would push this cause forward and save so many from suffering.